Advanced Search Results

Rupesh Kumar Karmeh Alias Rupesh Karmeh and ors Vs. the State of Jhark ...

Court : Jharkhand

Appellant : Rupesh Kumar Karmeh Alias Rupesh Karmeh and ors

Respondent : The State of Jharkhand

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3080 o”1. Rupesh Kumar Karmeh @ Rupesh Karmeh 2. Dinesh Kumar Karmeh @ Dinesh Karmeh 3. Kamal Raj Jajware ... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand...

Rupesh Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Rupesh Kumar

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. No.371 of 2000 Date of Decision:25. h September, 2013 RUPESH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma and Mr. Udayan Tandon, Advocates. versus...

Present:- Mr. Rupesh Kumar Advocate Vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Present:- Mr. Rupesh Kumar Advocate

Respondent : State of U.T. Chandigarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Criminal Revision No.133 of 2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.1309 of 2014 in/and Criminal Revision No.133 of 2014 Date of decision:-24.1.2014 Sehjad ...Petitioner Versus State of U.T.Chandigarh...

Rupesh Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Appellant : Rupesh Kumar

Respondent : The State of Bihar

Subject : Land Acquisition

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1096 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1096 of 2012 ====================================================== Rupesh Kumar .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite...

Rupesh Kumar and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Appellant : Rupesh Kumar and anr.

Respondent : State of Jharkhand and anr.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 304B and 328; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167(2)

Reported in : 2005(1)BLJR389; 2005CriLJ1802; I(2005)DMC268

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard the parties.2. By filing this application the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the order dated 14.7.2004, passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat, in G.R. Case No. 301...

Rupesh Kumar Pandey & Anr. vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Rupesh Kumar Pandey & Anr.

Respondent : State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8432/2025 & CRL.M.A. 35219/2025 RUPESH KUMAR PANDEY & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shaurya Bhatnagar, Mr. Ritish Chauhan, Advocates with P-1 & 2, Alongwith P-1 &...

Rupesh Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Appellant : Rupesh Kumar

Respondent : The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 582 of 2014 with W.P.(S) No. 3740 of 2013 with W.P.(S) No. 1816 of 2014 with W.P.(S) No. 6605 of 2014 with W.P.(S) No. 1820...

Rupesh Kumar Jha Alias Pappu Jha Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Appellant : Rupesh Kumar Jha Alias Pappu Jha

Respondent : The State of Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A.No.28 of 2013 Rupesh Kumar Jha @ Papu Jha. ... ... ...Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ...Opp. Party ---------- CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY...

Rupesh Kumar S/O Nischal Das Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Appellant : Rupesh Kumar S/O Nischal Das

Respondent : State of Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009CriLJ1822

T.P. Sharma, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 31-12-2008 passed by the Sessions Judge, Raipur in Sessions Trial No. 70/2008, whereby learned Sessions Judge after holding the...

Rupesh Kumar Chaudhary @ Roop Lal @ ... Vs State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Rupesh Kumar Chaudhary @ Roop Lal @ ...

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 306, 302, 201, 366

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?ORDER.1. Two FIRs, being FIR No.205/2003...