Advanced Search Results

Ramveer vs.state

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Ramveer

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on : July 03, 2019 Date of decision: July 15, 2019 CRL.A. 157/2010 RAMVEER STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar,...

Ramveer Upadhyay Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Ramveer Upadhyay

Respondent : The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.2953 OF2022Ramveer Upadhyay & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus State of U.P. & Anr. ...Respondents JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This special leave petition is against...

Ramveer Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Ramveer Singh

Respondent : State of U.P. and ors.

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Regularisation of Ad hoc Appointments (On Posts Outside the Purview of the Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979 - Rule 4

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3128

Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard counsel for the petitioners and Sri H. N. Singh, P. N. Tripathi, Sri Satya Prakash Pandey and other counsel in the connected writ petitions on behalf of the petitioners and Sri M....

Ramveer Jatav Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Ramveer Jatav

Respondent : State of U.P. and ors.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(3)

Reported in : AIR1987SC63; 1987CriLJ321; 1986(3)Crimes654(SC); JT1986(1)SC849; 1986(2)SCALE837; (1986)4SCC762

1 This is a petition for a writ of hebeas corpus challenging the validity of the Order of detention passed by the Distt. Magistrate, Agra on 31st August 1986, directing that the petitioner be detained in...

Ramveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : Ramveer Singh

Respondent : State of Rajasthan and ors.

Subject : Service

Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj943

Raghuvendra S. Rathore, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order of termination dated 30.5.1994 (Annexure 9). The petitioner has therefore prayed for quashing of the said and that he may be allowed to work...