Advanced Search Results
Ramkishan Digambar Jadhav and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Ramkishan Digambar Jadhav and Others
The State of Maharashtra and Others
Jul-03-2013
Land Acquisition
NareshH Patil, J. 1) The appellants were charged and tried for offence punishable under sections 498-A, 302 and 304-B read with section 34, Indian Penal Code, in Sessions Case No.23 of 1996 before the Additional Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkishan @ Bala and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Aurangabad
Ramkishan @ Bala and Others
State of Maharashtra
Oct-07-2014
Criminal
S.S. Shinde, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the appellants, aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Ambajogai on 24th December, 2013, thereby convicting the appellants for the offence punishable...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkishan@sonu vs.state
Delhi
Ramkishan@sonu
State
May-07-2018
Criminal
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 05.2018 BAIL APPLN. 599/2018 RAMKISHAN@SONU STATE versus ........ Petitioner ...... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: or the... Petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramkishan S/O Madhav Shelke Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Ramkishan S/O Madhav Shelke
The State of Maharashtra
Jan-08-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302 and 304
AIR2007SC761; 2007(1)SCALE101; (2007)3SCC89; 2007AIRSCW452; (2007)1Crimes141(SC); 2007(2)KCCRSN45(SC).
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant along with two others faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'). The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkishan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'ble ...
Madhya Pradesh
Ramkishan
The State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta
Mar-10-2014
Education
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE MADHYA PRADESH, JABAPLUR Single Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.K.Gupta,J.M.Cr.C. No.15643 of 2013 Ramkishan & others. Vs. State of M.P. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri R.S.Patel, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Advocate for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkishan @ Hallu Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Ramkishan @ Hallu
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Aug-13-2012
Criminal
M.Cr.C.No.8231/2012 13/08/2012 Shri A.D.Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants. Shri A.K.Singh, P.P.for the respondent/State. Heard finally. This is the fiRs.bail application filed by applicants under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of bail. The applicants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharat Ramkishan Wadkar (Padile) Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Its ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Bharat Ramkishan Wadkar (Padile)
State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary School Education Department and Others
Feb-11-2014
Education
Oral Judgment: (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.) 1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, taken up for final hearing. Since no adverse orders are being passed against respondent No.4, writ petition is heard and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkishan Agarwal Vs. State Bank of India Th.B.M.and ors
Madhya Pradesh
Ramkishan Agarwal
State Bank of India Th.B.M.and ors
Feb-21-2013
Education
C.R.639/2004 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR CIVIL REVISION No.639 of 2004 SINGLE BENCH: JUSTICE A.K.SHRIVASTAVA Applicant : Ramkishan Agarwal, S/o Late Bhagwan Das Agarwal, resident of Main Road, Gotegaon,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkishan Mithanlal Sharma Vs. the State of Bombay
Supreme Court of India
Ramkishan Mithanlal Sharma
The State of Bombay
Oct-22-1954
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395, 396 and 397; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 1(2), 162, 162(1), 297 and 423(2); Evidence Act - Sections 24, 25, 26, 27, 145 and 167
AIR1955SC104; (1955)57BOMLR600; 1955CriLJ196; [1955]1SCR903; (1954) 2 SCC 516
Bhagwati, J. 1. Anokhelal Ranjit Singh, original accused I and appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 1954, Harnarain Nanakchand, original accused 2 and appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 23 of 1954 and Ramkishan Mithanlal Sharma,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit Prasad Ramkishan Singh Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Ajit Prasad Ramkishan Singh
The State of Maharashtra
May-02-1972
CriminalFood Adulteration
AIR1972SC1631; 1972CriLJ1026; (1972)2SCC180; [1973]1SCR483; 1973(5)LC65(SC)
K.K. Mathew, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, is from the judgment of the High Court of Bombay, convicting the appellant under Section 16(l)(a)(i) read with Section 7(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »