Advanced Search Results

Ramchandra Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Ramchandra

Respondent : Emperor

Subject : Excise

Reported in : AIR1935All520

ORDERBennet, J.1. This is an application in revision by one Ramchandra who has been convicted by a Magistrate under Section 60(b) and (f), U.P. Excise Act, sentenced to six months and three-months' concurrent rigorous imprisonment under...

Ramchandra Babaji Gore Vs. Emperor

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Ramchandra Babaji Gore

Respondent : Emperor

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1935Bom137; 155Ind.Cas.101

Beaumont, C.J.1. This is an application in revision which comes before the Court in the following circumstances. The present applicant was charged jointly with accused No. 2, who was his first wife and who has recently...

Rameshchandra Ramchandra Vs. Emperor

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Rameshchandra Ramchandra

Respondent : Emperor

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Press (Emergency Powers) Act, 1931 - Sections 2, 2(6), 15, 18 and 18(1)

Reported in : AIR1950Bom246; (1950)52BOMLR229

Shah, J.1. The petitioner Rameshchandra was convicted by the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate, Bombay, of an offence under Section 18 (1), Press (Emergency Powers) Act XXIII (23) of 1931, for 'making' a pamphlet called 'Operation Asylum'...

Shripad Ramchandra Jog and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Shripad Ramchandra Jog and ors.

Respondent : Emperor

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1931Bom129

Beaumont, C.J. 1. These are three cases which have been argued together because they have certain features in common. Reference No. 88 of 1930 is a reference from the Sessions Judge of Nasik made to us...

Ramchandra Gangadhar Karve Vs. Emperor

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Ramchandra Gangadhar Karve

Respondent : Emperor

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 81Ind.Cas.972

Lallubhai Shah, A.C.J.1. The only question in this application is whether the notice given by the Municipality under Section 107 (1) of Bombay Act III of 1901 is valid. By that notice the petitioner was called...