Advanced Search Results
Rajiv Kumar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Rajiv Kumar
State of Uttar Pradesh
Aug-02-2017
Land Acquisition
CA NO.251 OF2017WITH CA NO.252 OF2017REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.251 OF2017RAJIV KUMAR …Appellant Versus STATE OF U.P. AND ANR. ...Respondents With CRIMINAL APPEAL No.252 OF2017NEERA YADAV …Appellant Versus...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajiv Kumar vs.state & Ors
Delhi
Rajiv Kumar
State & Ors
Oct-31-2018
Land Acquisition
$~O-23 & O-24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + 23 + 24 Date of Decision:31. t October, 2018 TEST.CAS. 60/2011 & I.A.12789/2011 SUDHA JHANWAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ambar Qamaruddin, Mr.Ajay...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayan Ram and Rajiv Kumar Suri and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and o ...
Jharkhand
Narayan Ram and Rajiv Kumar Suri and ors.
State of Jharkhand and ors.
Apr-05-2006
Service
Statutory Rules
[2006(3)JCR218(Jhr)]
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. Petitioner, Narayan Ram has preferred the writ petition [W.P.(S) 3782 of 2005] against the joint Notification Nos. 957/M, 958/M, 959/M, 963/M, 964/M & 978/M dated 10th June, 2005 and the office order contained...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajiv Narula Vs. State
Delhi
Rajiv Narula
State
Aug-11-2009
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 4, 32, 113A and 113B; Criminal Law (Second Amendment) Act, 1983; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 428; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 107, 302, 304B, 306 and 498A; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986
162(2009)DLT688
Mool Chand Garg, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of the aforesaid two appeals, filed by Rajiv Narula (hereinafter referred to as the first appellant) and by his mother Smt. Sunita Narula (hereinafter referred to as the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajiv Vs. State
Delhi
Rajiv
State
Mar-10-2014
Criminal
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. 02.2014 Date of Decision:10. 03.2014 % + CRL.A. 219 of 2010 RAJIV Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mohit Mathur, Mr. Shishir Mathur & Mr. Pankaj...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajiv Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Patna
Rajiv Singh
The State of Bihar
May-16-2014
Land Acquisition
1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant Rajiv Singh against the judgment of conviction dated 21.10.2011 whereunder, he has been found guilty for an offence punishable under Sections 304B, 201, 498A of the I.P.C....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjeev Nanda Vs. the State
Delhi
Sanjeev Nanda;rajiv Gupta
The State;state (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Jul-20-2009
Criminal
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 183, 184, 185, 185(1), 203 and 204; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 85, 201, 299, 299(3), 279, 300, 300(4), 302, 304, 304A, 311, 420 and 498A; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 6, 25, 27, 45, 74, 145 and 165; Road Safety Act, 1967 - Sections 1(1); Road Traffic Act, 1972 - Sections 6(1) and 10(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 117; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 36, 161, 161(3), 162, 162(1), 164, 165, 172(2), 173, 173(2), 173(8), 258, 309, 310, 311, 313, 340, 360 and 482; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 66; Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956; Probation of Offenders Act; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39A, 136, 226 and 227; Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 16 and 252A
160(2009)DLT775
Kailash Gambhir, J.The miracle is not to fly in air or to travel to the moon, but to walk on the earth', says a Chinese proverb.1. The increase in vehicular traffic alongwith the population of Delhi...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajiv Enterprises Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Rajiv Enterprises
State of Punjab and anr.
Feb-26-2010
Criminal
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(1), 6, 6A, 6A(2), 6B, 7 and 10A; ;Consumer Protection Act, 1986; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1989 - Sections 102 and 103; ;Essential Commodities Act, 1995 - Sections 3(2) and 4
Nirmaljit Kaur, J.1. This order shall dispose of both the aforementioned Criminal Revision Petitions bearing CRR Nos. 3045 and 3046 of 2009. However, for the sake of reference, the facts are being taken from Criminal Revision...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajiv Lochan Diwedi and Sanjay Diwedi and anr. Vs. State of U.P. (Now ...
Uttaranchal
Rajiv Lochan Diwedi and Sanjay Diwedi and anr.
State of U.P. (Now Uttarakhand)
Apr-06-2010
Criminal
B.C. Kandpal, J.1. These two appeals, under Section 374 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.), have been preferred against the judgments and orders dated 21.10.1997, passed by learned Sessions, Pithoragarh, in Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajiv Indira Colony Labour Welfare Association, Panchkula and Others V ...
Punjab and Haryana
Rajiv Indira Colony Labour Welfare Association, Panchkula and Others
State of Haryana and Others
Jan-19-2012
Land Acquisition
Hemant Gupta, J.(Oral) - The present petition has been filed by Rajiv Indira Colony Labour Welfare Association through its different office bearers claiming writ of certiorari quashing memo dated 13.9.2010 whereby respondents have proposed to allot...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »