Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: rajesh · Respondent: manoj · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.013 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 02 1998

Rajesh Kumar Vs. Manoj Jain

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Rajesh Kumar

Respondent : Manoj Jain

Decided on : Jun-02-1998

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 1998(47)DRJ353

J.B. Goel, J.1. By this order I shall dispose of is No. 7076/96 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 and is No. 4916/97 under Section 151 CPC filed by the plaintiff. The first application is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2025

Rajesh vs Manoj K

Court : Kerala

Appellant : Rajesh

Respondent : Manoj K

Decided on : Mar-28-2025

Subject : Education

COC.No.682/25 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CON.CASE(C) NO. 682 OF 2025 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2024

Rajesh Babu vs Manoj Kumar.S.Kurup

Court : Kerala

Appellant : Rajesh Babu

Respondent : Manoj Kumar.S.Kurup

Decided on : Feb-15-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 26TH MAGHA, 1945 OP(C) NO. 391 OF 2024 OS 44/2023 OF ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT/SUB COURT,KOTTARAKKARA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 13 2002

Rajesh Vs. Manoj

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Appellant : Rajesh

Respondent : Manoj

Decided on : May-13-2002

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142

Reported in : 2002(4)MPHT509

ORDERS.L. Kochar, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 24-1-2002, passed by IASJ, Barwani in Criminal Revision No. 161/2000, setting aside the order dated 15-4-2000, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barwani...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2013

Present: Mr. Rajesh Arora Advocate Vs. Manoj Kumar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Present: Mr. Rajesh Arora Advocate

Respondent : Manoj Kumar

Decided on : Jan-24-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Revision No.3226 of 2010 Date of decision :24. 01.2013 Smt. Pushpa Devi and another .....Petitioners VERSUS Manot Kumar ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1995

Rajesh Ahuja Vs. Manoj Mittal and anr.

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Rajesh Ahuja

Respondent : Manoj Mittal and anr.

Decided on : Sep-01-1995

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 37, Rule 3(5)

Reported in : 60(1995)DLT101; 1995(34)DRJ661; (1995)111PLR61

ORDERxxxvII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure makes Section 79 and Section 80 of the Negotiable Instruments Act specifically applicable to a case Filed under Order xxxvII. Hence, in suits on hundis Filed under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2009

Rajesh Singh and ors. Vs. Manoj Kumar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Appellant : Rajesh Singh and ors.

Respondent : Manoj Kumar

Decided on : Aug-21-2009

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR2010MP16; 2009(4)MPHT373

ORDERA.P. Shrivastava, J.1. This writ petition is filed by the defendant challenging the order dated 15-4-2009 passed by Second Additional District Judge to the Court of First Additional District Judge, Gwalior in Civil Suit Mo. 59-A/06...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1997

Rajesh Ahuja Vs. Manoj Mittal and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Rajesh Ahuja

Respondent : Manoj Mittal and anr.

Decided on : Dec-05-1997

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1998SC2931; JT1997(10)SC164

Verma,CJI.1. Leave granted.2. Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties we are not inclined to interfere with the grant of leave to defendant, but we are of the opinion that the terms on which leave...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial