Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: raj narain · Respondent: state · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.041 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 06 1953

Raj NaraIn and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Raj NaraIn and ors.

Respondent : State

Decided on : Oct-06-1953

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 146, 147, 149, 304, 451 and 456

Reported in : AIR1954All249

Randhir Singh, J.1. The appellants Raj Narain, Kallu and Banwari have been convicted by the Sessions Judge of Rae Bareli and have been sentenced to various terms of imprisonment under Sections 304, 342, 366, 454, 149...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1995

Raj NaraIn Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Raj Narain

Respondent : State

Decided on : Feb-06-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 57(1995)DLT755

P.K. Bahri, J.(1) This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 10/11/1990 of an Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi by which he convicted the appellant of an offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C. having intentionally caused the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1960

Raj NaraIn Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Raj Narain

Respondent : State

Decided on : Aug-16-1960

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(3) and 19(5); Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932 - Sections 7 and 7(1)

Reported in : AIR1961All531; 1961CriLJ586a

A.N. Mulla, J. 1. This is a petition filed by Sri Raj Narain, who is a member of the Legislative Assembly of Uttar Pradesh under Article 228 of the Constitution of India. Sri Raj Narain is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 09 1952

Raj NaraIn and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Raj NaraIn and ors.

Respondent : The State

Decided on : Sep-09-1952

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 234, 235, 236, 239 and 537

Reported in : AIR1953All448

Brij Mohan Lall, J. 1. As many as sixteen persons were put on their trial on a charge of dacoity before the learned Sessions Judge of RaeBareli. The trial resulted in the acquittal of nine. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2014

Raj NaraIn Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Raj Narain

Respondent : State of Haryana

Decided on : May-26-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

232 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.1135 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision: May 26, 2014 Raj Narain ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH Present:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2003

Raj NaraIn @ Kuka S/O Sansari Chand Mahajan Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Raj NaraIn @ Kuka S/O Sansari Chand Mahajan

Respondent : State of Punjab

Decided on : Jan-22-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 100 and 401; Lubricating Oils and Greases (Processing, Supply and Distribution Regulation) Order, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3235

Satish Kumar Mittal, J. 1. Raj Narain alias Kuka has filed the presentrevisional petition under Section 401 of the Code ofCriminal Procedure quashing the order dated 27.4.2000(Annexure P-1), passed by Additional Sessions Judge,Mansa, vide which the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2009

Raj NaraIn Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Raj NaraIn Singh

Respondent : State of U.P. and ors.

Decided on : Sep-18-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 27 and 30; Evidence Act - Sections 134; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 307, 323 and 342; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 357(3), 378 and 386; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : JT2009(12)SC342; 2009(12)SCALE627; (2009)10SCC362; 2009(10)LC4651(SC); 2009(5)LHSC3408

Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. Leave Granted.2. The present Criminal Appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order passed by the Allahabad High Court whereby it reversed the judgment and order of conviction passed by the trial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 1958

Raj NaraIn and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Raj NaraIn and ors.

Respondent : The State

Decided on : Oct-29-1958

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 369, 424, 430, 439 and 561A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR1959All315; 1959CriLJ543

O.H. Mootham, C.J.1. The question which has been referred to this Bench is 'whether this Court has power to revoke, review, recall or alter its own earlier decision in a Criminal Revision and rehear the same?...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 1981

Raj NaraIn Pratap NaraIn Vs. U.P. State Electricity Board

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Raj NaraIn Pratap Narain

Respondent : U.P. State Electricity Board

Decided on : Sep-11-1981

Subject : CivilArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1982All14

ORDERN.N. Mithal, J.1. The present revision is directed against the order passed by the court below rejecting the plaintiffs application for issue of temporary injunction in the proceedings under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2004

Raj NaraIn Dubey Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Raj NaraIn Dubey

Respondent : State of U.P. and ors.

Decided on : Sep-22-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 1 and 47; Army Pension Regulations; Army Pension Rules, 1972

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1424; [2005(107)FLR437]

Devi Prasad Singh, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner was appointed on the post of Police Constable in the year 1971. Thereafter, he has been continued in service as regular employee of the department....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial