Advanced Search Results

Radhey Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Radhey

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1970CriLJ1544

B.N. Lokur, J.1. Appellant Radhey and two others, Parsa and Ham Prasad, were tried together for offences under Section 302 read with Section 34 and Section 328 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code....

Radhey Shyam and Etc. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Radhey Shyam and Etc.

Respondent : State of U.P.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 381

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1227

G.P. Mathur, J.1. I agree with the opinion of my brother Hon'ble M.A. Khan, J. that both the appeals be allowed and the conviction as well as the sentences imposed upon the appellants be set aside....

Radhey Shyam Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Radhey Shyam

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164 and 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 354 and 452

Reported in : 35(1988)DLT112

M.K. Chawla, J.(1) On 1st February, 1982, Jai Parkash was posted as Duty Constable at Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi. At about 4.20 P.M., he gave an information, on telephone, to the Police Post, Malviya Nagar, that...

Radhey Shyam Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Radhey Shyam

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RESERVED ON:23. 09.2014 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2014 CRL.A. 1111/2013 RADHEY SHYAM versus STATE CRL.A. 119/2014 JAIPAL SINGH ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus...

Radhey Shyam Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Radhey Shyam

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RESERVED ON:23. 09.2014 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 12.2014 CRL.A. 1111/2013 RADHEY SHYAM versus STATE CRL.A. 119/2014 JAIPAL SINGH ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ..... Appellant versus...

Radhey Shyam and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : Radhey Shyam and ors.

Respondent : State of Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148 and 302

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2227

Bansal, J.1. As many as 12 accused were put on trial before the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 3, Kota, in Sessions Case No. 72/94. The learned trial Judge acquitted accused Ram Gopal, Mangilal, Mukutbihari, Mahendra,...

CaptaIn Radhey Shyam and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : CaptaIn Radhey Shyam and anr.

Respondent : State of U.P.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3709; I(1994)DMC260

K. Narayan, J.1. This appeal Under Section 374(2) Criminal Procedure Code is directed against, the conviction and sentence dated 31.3 1985 rendered by the District and Sessions Judge, Almora in Session Trial No. 32 of 1984...

Himma, Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Himma, ;radhey and Laxami NaraIn Sons of Himma

Respondent : State of U.P.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Excise Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 304, 304(I) and 436

Reported in : 2005CriLJ4200

Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.1. The present appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 29.4.1981 passed by X Addl. Sessions Judge, Kanpur in S.T. No. 291 of 1979 whereby the appellants were convicted under Section...

Radhey Shyam Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Radhey Shyam

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :24.10.2013 Judgment delivered on:06.11.2013 CRL.A. 1375/2010 RADHEY SHYAM Through: ..... Appellant Mr.R.N.Dubey, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP. CORAM:...

Radhey Shyam Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Radhey Shyam

Respondent : The State

Subject : Criminal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. No.471/2003 Date of Decision:14. h March, 2014 + # ! CHARAN SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through:...