Advanced Search Results
B.i.F.R., Vs. H.E.C. Ltd. and ors.,
Jharkhand
B.i.F.R., ;h.E.C. Ltd. and Ram Janam Singh
H.E.C. Ltd. and ors., ;b.i.F.R. and ors., ;union of India (Uoi) and ors. and P.O. Industrial Tribun
Nov-02-2006
Civil
[2007(3)JCR107(Jhr)]
ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Reference may be made to the order dated 14.9.2006 which reads as under:An affidavit has been filed by the Union of India stating, inter alia, that in terms of the order dated 13.7.2006,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.B. Champalal Ramsarup Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, èu.P.
Allahabad
R.B. Champalal Ramsarup
Commissioner of Income-tax, èu.P.
Sep-24-1962
Direct Taxation
[1964]52ITR194(All)
MANCHANDA J. - This is a case stated under section 66(2) of the Income-tax (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal).The questions referred ar...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.R.M.T.T. Muthukaruppan Chettiar Vs. S.P.L. Subbiah Chettiar and anr.
Chennai
A.R.M.T.T. Muthukaruppan Chettiar
S.P.L. Subbiah Chettiar and anr.
Aug-29-1941
Civil
AIR1942Mad34; (1941)2MLJ653
Wadsworth, J.1. This appeal arises out of an application by the appellant to scale down a preliminary decree on a mortgage. The mortgage in question was originally contracted on 5th January, 1931, on the security of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
A.L.A.R. Arunachellum Chettiar Vs. P.S.K. Haji Sheik Meera Rowther
Chennai
A.L.A.R. Arunachellum Chettiar
P.S.K. Haji Sheik Meera Rowther
Feb-25-1910
Civil
7Ind.Cas.856a
1. The 2nd defendant who is the appellant before us claims ratable distribution out of moneys realised in execution of the decree in Original Suit No. 681 of 1904 on the file of the District Munsif...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. RSR Infra Works (India) Pvt Ltd and PVSRSN Enterprises Pvt Ltd (J ...
Andhra Pradesh
M/s. RSR Infra Works (India) Pvt Ltd and PVSRSN Enterprises Pvt Ltd (JV), Rajahmundry, reptd. by its General Power of Attorney Holder-R.Gopal Krishna
State of A.P., reptd by the Principal Secretary to Govt., Irrigation and CAD Department, Hyderabad and Another
Sep-02-2015
Land Acquisition
In pursuance of tender notice No.2/2010-11, dated 07.02.2011, issued by respondent No.2, the petitioner has offered its tender for execution of the work of Providing balance hydro mechanical items for spill way regulator, formation of flood...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. G.R. International Vs. Commissioner of Customs (P),
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
M/S. G.R. International
Commissioner of Customs (P),
Mar-07-2001
Service Tax
1. On hearing both sides on the stay application, the appeal was taken up for final disposal after disposal after granting waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs.5,66,169/- and penalty of Rs.30,000/-.2. We have heard Shri...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG.V.R. Cable Network Vs. Channel Plus A.P.
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
G.V.R. Cable Network
Channel Plus A.P.
Mar-30-2006
Miscellaneous
1. Issue notice. Mr.Yogesh Guptal, learned Counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent.2. The prayer in this petition is to issue a direction to the respondents to resume signals pertaining to Gemini, Teja and Aditya channels...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.M.M.C.T. Vyravan Chetti Vs. V.K.N.S.P. Subramanian Chetti
Mumbai
R.M.M.C.T. Vyravan Chetti
V.K.N.S.P. Subramanian Chetti
Apr-26-1920
Property
(1920)22BOMLR1357
Buckmaster, J.1. Their Lordships think it unnecessary to trouble counsel for the respondents in this case.2. The appellants are the first mortgagees of certain property. The respondents hold a second mortgage upon the same estates. It...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.R. Tupkari Vs. Sushilabai P. Chikate and anr.
Mumbai
B.R. Tupkari
Sushilabai P. Chikate and anr.
Apr-28-1982
Tenancy
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, Sections 13 and 25
1982(1)BomCR719; (1982)84BOMLR376; 1983MhLJ62
Sharad Manohar, J.1. This is a writ petition filed by a tenant against a decree for eviction passed by the lower Appellate Court, setting aside the trial Court's decree of dismissal of the suit.2. The error...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra R. Chhapwale Vs. Akshaya Hospital and Research Centre (P.) Lt ...
Mumbai
Rajendra R. Chhapwale
Akshaya Hospital and Research Centre (P.) Ltd.
Jun-21-2007
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398, 402 and 439(1)
[2007]79SCL419(Bom)
D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. The Company Petition was originally instituted for reliefs under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956. In pursuance of an amendment that was allowed during the pendency of the Petition the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »