Advanced Search Results
Queen-empress Vs. Brij NaraIn Man
Allahabad
Queen-empress
Brij NaraIn Man
Dec-31-1969
Criminal
(1898)ILR20All529
Louis Kershaw, C.J. and Aikman, J.1. This is an application asking this Court to quash a commitment. The applicant Brij Narain Man was implicated in a dacoity: a pardon was tendered to him by the Magistrate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskQueen-empress Vs. NaraIn Singh
Allahabad
Queen-empress
NaraIn Singh
Dec-31-1969
Criminal
(1900)ILR22All340
Knox, Actg. C.J. and Blair, J.1. Narain Singh, a constable, was convicted by the District Magistrate of Jhansi of an offence under Section 29 of Act V of 1861, and sentenced to two months' rigorous imprisonment....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskQueen-empress Vs. Ram NaraIn and anr.
Allahabad
Queen-empress
Ram NaraIn and anr.
Dec-31-1969
Criminal
(1886)ILR8All514
Brodhurst, J.1. In this case Ram Narain and Ganeshi were convicted by the Joint Magistrate of Cawnpore under Section 342 of the Indian Penal Code, and were sentenced to pay fines of Rs. 200 and Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Queen-empress Vs. Narain
Allahabad
Queen-empress
Narain
Dec-31-1969
Criminal
(1887)ILR9All240
John Edge, Kt., C.J.1. I am of opinion that the principle enunciated in the ruling reported in the Madras High Court Reports, Vol. 6, p. xxiii (Appendix), is applicable to a case arising under Section 488...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›