Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: pushpa · Respondent: the commissioner · Page 1 of about 13 results (0.020 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 30 1993

Smt. Pushpa Devi Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Appellant : Smt. Pushpa Devi

Respondent : Assistant Commissioner of

Decided on : Apr-30-1993

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1993)46ITD468(JP.)

Where all the legal representative not brought on record by issuing requisite notices on them, assessment not was valid.The LRs of the deceased assessee, at the time of his death, include minor sons and daughters as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 1993

Pushpa Vihar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax.

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Pushpa Vihar

Respondent : Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax.

Decided on : Jul-12-1993

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1994)48TTJ(Mumbai)389

ORDERM. K. CHATURVEDI, J.M. :This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-X, Bombay and pertains to the asst. yr. 1988-89.2. The solitary ground take in this appeal relates to the sustenance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 1977

Pushpa Devi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Pushpa Devi

Respondent : Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi

Decided on : Aug-30-1977

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 261; Gift-tax Act, 1958 - Sections 26(1); Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(2) and 3(3); Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1977SC2230; [1977]109ITR730(SC); (1977)4SCC184; [1978]1SCR329; 1977(9)LC580(SC)

Y.V. Chandrachud, J.1. Two questions arise for consideration in this appeal one of them being subsidiary to the other. The main question is whether a Hindu female who is a member of an undivided family can...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 01 2026

Pushpa Siddesh Gundi vs the Deputy Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

Appellant : Pushpa Siddesh Gundi

Respondent : The Deputy Commissioner

Decided on : Apr-01-2026

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 22054 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:1. PUSHPA SIDDESH GUNDI W/O LATE G.S.SIDDESH...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2025

Pushpa Sundaram Vs THE COMMISSIONER

Court : Chennai

Appellant : Pushpa Sundaram

Respondent : The Commissioner

Decided on : Jul-14-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 14-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN CMP No. 2796 of 2024 in W.A.SR.No.46226 of 2022 Pushpa Sundaram W/o.Sundaram, No.5A, New West Street,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2025

Pushpa Sundaram Vs THE COMMISSIONER

Court : Chennai

Appellant : Pushpa Sundaram

Respondent : The Commissioner

Decided on : Aug-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-08-2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI W.A No. 2520 of 2025 Pushpa Sundaram W/o.Sundaram, No.5A, New West Street, Avvai Nagar,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2010

Pushpa Vs. the Commissioner,

Court : Chennai

Appellant : Pushpa

Respondent : The Commissioner,

Decided on : Sep-24-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of Indian - Article 226

1. Heard Mr.Mohan Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Thangaraja, learned Government Advocate for the respondent.2. The petitioner was appointed as a Cook at the Noon Meal Centre under the Nutritious Meal Scheme in Thiagadurgam...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2008

Pushpa W/O Purushottam Waghade Vs. Additional Commissioner and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Pushpa W/O Purushottam Waghade

Respondent : Additional Commissioner and ors.

Decided on : Mar-24-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayat Act; Right to Information Act (RTI); Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch Vote of No Confidence Rules - Rule 2(1) and 2(2)

Reported in : 2008(5)MhLj104

A.H. Joshi, J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable and is heard by consent.2. The petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati, in appeal filed by the petitioner challenging the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2000

Pushpa Chemicals Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Appellant : Pushpa Chemicals

Respondent : Commissioner of Central Excise

Decided on : Dec-04-2000

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2001)(129)ELT133Tri(Chennai)

1. The Stay application and appeal arise out of the dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground that there was a delay of 5 days in filing the appeal, under Section 35...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2002

Pushpa Godhwani Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Pushpa Godhwani

Respondent : Commissioner of Income-tax

Decided on : Dec-03-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2 and 16A

Reported in : (2003)179CTR(Del)540; [2003]260ITR582(Delhi)

D.K. Jain, J.1. An order dated November 27, 2001, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'F', New Delhi, in W. T. A. Nos. 71/Delhi of 1997 and 654/Delhi of 1996 pertaining to the assessment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial