Advanced Search Results
Siddik Singh Pritam Singh Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Siddik Singh Pritam Singh
State of Maharashtra
Jan-19-1993
Criminal
1993CriLJ2919
Saldanha, J.1. Occasionally, criminal trials bring before the Courts human beings who are accused of acts of shuddering brutality. In this day and age, the offence of rape, which was more in tune with tribal society...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSohan Singh Pritam Singh Vs. State
Punjab and Haryana
Sohan Singh Pritam Singh
State
Apr-08-1953
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 304
AIR1953P& H261
Kapur, J.1. This is an appeal brought by Sohan Singh against his conviction for an offence under Section 302, Penal Code.2. The facts of the case are that on 31-5-1948 between the hours of 6 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGurdev Singh, S/O Pritam Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Gurdev Singh, S/O Pritam Singh
State of Punjab
Mar-08-1995
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Section 307; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, (TADA) 1987 - Section 5
1995Supp(4)SCC240
R.M. Sahai and; G.N. Ray, JJ.1. The appellant was charged and tried under Section 307 IPC and Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 ('Act' for short). He has been acquitted of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pritam Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Pritam Singh and anr.
The State of Punjab
Nov-04-1955
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 136; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342, 367, 403 and 539B; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9 and 45; Arms Act - Sections 19
AIR1956SC415; 1956CriLJ805
Bhagwati, J.1. This is an appeal with special leave by Pritam Singh, son of Surain Singh, hereinafter called Pritam Singh Fatehpuri, and Pritam Singh, son of Ladha Singh, hereinafter called Pritam Singh Lohara, against their conviction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPritam Singh Sohan Singh Vs. the State
Punjab and Haryana
Pritam Singh Sohan Singh
The State
Nov-26-1953
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 164; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 302
AIR1954P& H201
Harnam Singh, J.1. In Sessions Trial No. 13 of 1953 the Court of Session has convicted Gehna Singh, aged 25 years, and Pritam Singh, aged 22 years, under Section 302 read with Section 34, Penal Code,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPritam Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Pritam Singh and ors.
The State of Punjab
Dec-11-1975
Criminal
1977CriLJ51
Gurnam Singh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur, dated 18-9-1972 vide which Pritam Singh son of Hari Singh, Shamir Singh and Amar Singh sons of Pritam Singh,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPritam Singh and anr. Vs. the State
Punjab and Haryana
Pritam Singh and anr.
The State
Apr-01-1954
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 108 and 165A; Weights and Measures Act, 1941 - Sections 18 and 37
AIR1954P& H228
Harnam Singh, J.1. In criminal case No. 17 of 1953 the Special Judge has convicted Tarlok Nath under Section 165A of the Indian Penal Code, hereinafter referred to as the Code, and Pritam Singh under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPritam Singh and anr. Vs. State
Punjab and Haryana
Pritam Singh and anr.
State
Sep-16-1968
Criminal
1969CriLJ848
1. Pritam Singh and Bakhtwar Singh, both of village Dhurkot Ransin, not in any way related to each other but united merely by bond of friendship, were brought to trial under Section 302/34, I.P.C. before the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPritam Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Pritam Singh
State of Haryana
May-14-2014
Education
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh .....Criminal Appeal No.S-798-SB of 2003 ....Date of decision:14.5.2014 Pritam Singh ...Appellant v. State of Haryana ...Respondent ...Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Inderjit Singh ....Present: Mr.R.S.Rana, Advocate for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPritam Singh Dalip Singh and anr. Vs. the State
Punjab and Haryana
Pritam Singh Dalip Singh and anr.
The State
Oct-07-1965
Criminal
Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 9
AIR1967P& H50
ORDERJ.S. Bedi, J.1. This order shall dispose of three revision petitions Nos. 371 (by Bant Singh), 377 (by Pritam Singh and Nichhattar Singh), and 883 by (Sikandar Singh and Sampuran Singh) of 1965, as they arise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »