Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: parmod kumar · Respondent: state · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.009 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 05 2008

Parmod Kumar and ors. Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Appellant : Parmod Kumar and ors.

Respondent : State of H.P.

Decided on : Nov-05-2008

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2479

Surinder Singh, J.1. The appellants have challenged their conviction and sentence passed by the learned trial Court in Sessions Trial No. 4 of 2006, under Section 450, 395 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 1989

Parmod Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Parmod Kumar

Respondent : State

Decided on : Oct-18-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 1990CriLJ68; 40(1990)DLT289

Malik Sharief-Ud-Din, J. (1) Five persons, namely, Padam Singh, Ram Avtar, Ramesh, Parmod Kumar appellant and Sri Kant were charged by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, for offences under sections 148, 302 read with section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2012

Parmod Kumar Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Parmod Kumar

Respondent : State of Haryana

Decided on : Mar-01-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Vijender Singh Malik, J. This is an appeal brought by Parmod Kumar, the appellant challenging the judgment dated 13.8.2002 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar vide which, he has been held guilty and convicted for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 05 2013

Parmod Kumar Bansal Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Parmod Kumar Bansal

Respondent : State of Haryana

Decided on : Oct-05-2013

Subject : Criminal

CRM No.M-28129 of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-28129 of 2013 Date of Decision: - 05.10.2013 Parmod Kumar Bansal .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2014

Parmod Kumar Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Parmod Kumar

Respondent : State of Haryana

Decided on : May-20-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

CRM-M No.14317 of 2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-14317 of 2014 Date of decision :20. 05.2014 Parmod Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 1989

Parmod Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Parmod Kumar

Respondent : State

Decided on : Jul-04-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 376

Reported in : 39(1989)DLT45

Charanjit Talwar, J. (1) (RULE D.B.) The appellant, Parmod Kumar aged about 20 years, has been convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code for having committed rape on Public Witness 8, Rashmi, a girl...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2013

Parmod Kumar Yadav Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Parmod Kumar Yadav

Respondent : State of Haryana and Others

Decided on : Apr-04-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

CWP No.7188 o”1. HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.7188 of 2013 Date of decision:04.04.2013 Parmod Kumar Yadav ...Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 1992

Parmod Kumar Shahi and Others Vs. State of Bihar and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Parmod Kumar Shahi and Others

Respondent : State of Bihar and Others

Decided on : Feb-14-1992

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : AIR1994SC42

1. We have heard Mr. P.P. Rao, learned senior counsel for the petitioners, Mr. A. Sharan, for the Sitamarhi Central Co-operative Bank (respondent No. 5) and Mr. A.K. Srivastava for the four interveners. The appellants seek...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial