Advanced Search Results
Joseph Nadar, Vs. Victor Suvisesha Muthu,
Chennai
Joseph Nadar, ;p. Mandhiramoorthy (Died), ;s. Mandhiramoorthy and Chellammal
Victor Suvisesha Muthu, ;m. Vishalakshi and N. Shanmugathal
Jan-22-2009
Property
Tamil Nadu Agricultural Lands Record and Tenancy Rights Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 2(8) and 15; Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955 - Sections 2; Tiruchirappalli Kaiaeruvaram and Mattuparam Act, 1958 - Sections 7; Tamil Nadu Public Trusts (Regulation of Administration of Agricultural Lands) Act, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96 and 100
(2009)6MLJ1095
S. Rajeswaran, J.1. The defendants in O.S. No. 47 of 1986 on the file of the District Munsif, Srivaikundam are the appellants before this Court.2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P. State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Regional Manager Vs. ...
Allahabad
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Regional Manager
Smt. Alaka Wife of Late Devendra Singh, ;k.M. Preeti D/O Late Devendra Singh, ;master Vishal and Mas
Jul-28-2008
Service
2009(1)AWC204; [2008(118)FLR1171]; (2009)ILLJ565All
Amitava Lala, J.1. All the appeals are analogously heard because a common question is involved herein. The common question is whether insurance company is liable to pay interest and/or penalty to the claimants even in absence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of A.P. Vs. M.A. Rahim
Andhra Pradesh
The State of A.P.
M.A. Rahim
Mar-04-1977
Sales Tax
[1977]40STC173(AP)
Sambasiva Rao, Ag. C.J.1. A question of some consequence relating to the scope of Section 14(4) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act arises for decision in this batch of tax revision cases.2. These cases...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
S.P. Borkar and ors. Vs. Ntc (S.M.) Ltd. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
S.P. Borkar and ors.
Ntc (S.M.) Ltd. and ors.
Feb-14-2001
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28, 5, 9
2001(4)ALLMR(SC)275; [2001(90)FLR1114]; (2001)ILLJ1415SC; 2001(2)SCALE346; (2001)10SCC232
S. Rajendra Babu and; S.N. Phukan, JJ.1. On complaint made by the appellants in each one of these cases under Section 28 read with Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Chhaganlal Daga Vs. M. Sanjay Shaw
Supreme Court of India
P. Chhaganlal Daga
M. Sanjay Shaw
Oct-05-2001
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 311
[2003]114CompCas30(SC); (2003)11SCC486
1. Leave granted.2. It is very unfortunate that the High Court by the impugned judgment has interfered with an order passed by a trial magistrate permitting the complainant to produce a document though at the fag...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovt. of A.P. Vs. M. Srinivasa Reddy and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Govt. of A.P.
M. Srinivasa Reddy and ors.
Nov-13-1997
Service
(1998)8SCC765
ORDER1. Delay condoned.2. Special leave granted.3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.4. This appeal arises out of a writ petition filed by the respondents who are employed as Associate Professors in the Andhra...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRegional Manager, A.P. Srtc and anr. Vs. C.M. Pavana Kumari
Supreme Court of India
Regional Manager, A.P. Srtc and anr.
C.M. Pavana Kumari
Dec-06-2000
Service
(2001)ILLJ1681SC; (2001)10SCC585
ORDERS. Rajendra Babu, J.1. The respondent filed a writ petition in the High Court stating that her representation to provide Class-IV appointment to her, had not been appropriately considered but rejected. The High Court without looking...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJohn Tinson and Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. N.D.M.C. and anr.
Delhi
John Tinson and Co. (P) Ltd.
N.D.M.C. and anr.
Sep-09-1996
Property
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 6(1)(A)(2)
64(1996)DLT114
S.N. Kapoor, J.(1) The petitioner, a Private Limited Company in Cwp 14 to 16 of 1982 have challenged assessment of property bearing No. (i) 54/3 and 54/4; and (ii) 54, 54/1, 54/2, 54/5, 54/6 to 12,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.P. Perumal Chettiar Vs. M.K. Kondal Chetty and anr.
Chennai
S.P. Perumal Chettiar
M.K. Kondal Chetty and anr.
Nov-03-1938
Tenancy
AIR1939Mad430; (1939)1MLJ80
Burn, J.1. The appellant is the owner of 1/34, Selva Vinayakar Koil Street, Old Washermanpet, Madras. This house is the superstructure upon a site belonging to the respondents, and the appellant pays ground rent to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.R. Srinivasa Aiyangar Vs. M.D. Narayana Aiyangar
Chennai
P.R. Srinivasa Aiyangar
M.D. Narayana Aiyangar
Apr-16-1917
Civil
(1917)33MLJ539
1. So far as I am able to see there are no merits in these cases. But I have to deal with the question of law which is one of considerable importance and argued before me;...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »