Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: p · Respondent: m · Page 1 of about 1,154 results (0.026 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 22 2009

Joseph Nadar, Vs. Victor Suvisesha Muthu,

Court : Chennai

Appellant : Joseph Nadar, ;p. Mandhiramoorthy (Died), ;s. Mandhiramoorthy and Chellammal

Respondent : Victor Suvisesha Muthu, ;m. Vishalakshi and N. Shanmugathal

Decided on : Jan-22-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Agricultural Lands Record and Tenancy Rights Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 2(8) and 15; Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955 - Sections 2; Tiruchirappalli Kaiaeruvaram and Mattuparam Act, 1958 - Sections 7; Tamil Nadu Public Trusts (Regulation of Administration of Agricultural Lands) Act, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96 and 100

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ1095

S. Rajeswaran, J.1. The defendants in O.S. No. 47 of 1986 on the file of the District Munsif, Srivaikundam are the appellants before this Court.2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2008

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Regional Manager Vs. ...

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Regional Manager

Respondent : Smt. Alaka Wife of Late Devendra Singh, ;k.M. Preeti D/O Late Devendra Singh, ;master Vishal and Mas

Decided on : Jul-28-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC204; [2008(118)FLR1171]; (2009)ILLJ565All

Amitava Lala, J.1. All the appeals are analogously heard because a common question is involved herein. The common question is whether insurance company is liable to pay interest and/or penalty to the claimants even in absence...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1977

The State of A.P. Vs. M.A. Rahim

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Appellant : The State of A.P.

Respondent : M.A. Rahim

Decided on : Mar-04-1977

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1977]40STC173(AP)

Sambasiva Rao, Ag. C.J.1. A question of some consequence relating to the scope of Section 14(4) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act arises for decision in this batch of tax revision cases.2. These cases...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 14 2001

S.P. Borkar and ors. Vs. Ntc (S.M.) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : S.P. Borkar and ors.

Respondent : Ntc (S.M.) Ltd. and ors.

Decided on : Feb-14-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28, 5, 9

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR(SC)275; [2001(90)FLR1114]; (2001)ILLJ1415SC; 2001(2)SCALE346; (2001)10SCC232

S. Rajendra Babu and; S.N. Phukan, JJ.1. On complaint made by the appellants in each one of these cases under Section 28 read with Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2001

P. Chhaganlal Daga Vs. M. Sanjay Shaw

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : P. Chhaganlal Daga

Respondent : M. Sanjay Shaw

Decided on : Oct-05-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 311

Reported in : [2003]114CompCas30(SC); (2003)11SCC486

1. Leave granted.2. It is very unfortunate that the High Court by the impugned judgment has interfered with an order passed by a trial magistrate permitting the complainant to produce a document though at the fag...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1997

Govt. of A.P. Vs. M. Srinivasa Reddy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Govt. of A.P.

Respondent : M. Srinivasa Reddy and ors.

Decided on : Nov-13-1997

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1998)8SCC765

ORDER1. Delay condoned.2. Special leave granted.3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.4. This appeal arises out of a writ petition filed by the respondents who are employed as Associate Professors in the Andhra...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2000

Regional Manager, A.P. Srtc and anr. Vs. C.M. Pavana Kumari

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Regional Manager, A.P. Srtc and anr.

Respondent : C.M. Pavana Kumari

Decided on : Dec-06-2000

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2001)ILLJ1681SC; (2001)10SCC585

ORDERS. Rajendra Babu, J.1. The respondent filed a writ petition in the High Court stating that her representation to provide Class-IV appointment to her, had not been appropriately considered but rejected. The High Court without looking...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1996

John Tinson and Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. N.D.M.C. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Appellant : John Tinson and Co. (P) Ltd.

Respondent : N.D.M.C. and anr.

Decided on : Sep-09-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 6(1)(A)(2)

Reported in : 64(1996)DLT114

S.N. Kapoor, J.(1) The petitioner, a Private Limited Company in Cwp 14 to 16 of 1982 have challenged assessment of property bearing No. (i) 54/3 and 54/4; and (ii) 54, 54/1, 54/2, 54/5, 54/6 to 12,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 1938

S.P. Perumal Chettiar Vs. M.K. Kondal Chetty and anr.

Court : Chennai

Appellant : S.P. Perumal Chettiar

Respondent : M.K. Kondal Chetty and anr.

Decided on : Nov-03-1938

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR1939Mad430; (1939)1MLJ80

Burn, J.1. The appellant is the owner of 1/34, Selva Vinayakar Koil Street, Old Washermanpet, Madras. This house is the superstructure upon a site belonging to the respondents, and the appellant pays ground rent to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1917

P.R. Srinivasa Aiyangar Vs. M.D. Narayana Aiyangar

Court : Chennai

Appellant : P.R. Srinivasa Aiyangar

Respondent : M.D. Narayana Aiyangar

Decided on : Apr-16-1917

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1917)33MLJ539

1. So far as I am able to see there are no merits in these cases. But I have to deal with the question of law which is one of considerable importance and argued before me;...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial