Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: p ramanathan · Respondent: ito · Page 1 of about 1 results (0.021 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Nov 17 2000

P. Ramanathan Vs. Ito

Court : Chennai

Appellant : P. Ramanathan

Respondent : ito

Decided on : Nov-17-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)170CTR(Mad)245

ORDERR. Jayasimha Babu, J.The submission of the petitioner is that notice having been issued as provided for in rule 119(3), the interest under section 220(2) cannot be taken note of for the purpose of determination of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales