Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: niranjan · Respondent: emperor · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.005 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 05 1934

Niranjan Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Niranjan

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Mar-05-1934

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1934All811; 150Ind.Cas.1140

ORDERBennet, J.1. This is an application in revision on behalf of one Niranjan who has been sentenced by the appellate Court to 9 months' Rule I, under Section 411, Penal Code. The application has been argued...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 1933

Niranjan Singh and Anot Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Niranjan Singh and Anot

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Jan-23-1933

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : 147Ind.Cas.227

Young, J.1. This is an application in revision from an order of the Sessions Judge of Bulandshahr against the applicants binding them over under Section 110 for one year.2. This is a somewhat unusual case under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1943

Niranjan Lal Mittal Vs. Emperor Through Chandra Shekhar

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Niranjan Lal Mittal

Respondent : Emperor Through Chandra Shekhar

Decided on : Sep-20-1943

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1944All40

ORDERPlowden, J.1. This is an application from a complaint made by the Sessions Judge of Aligarh on 18th October 1942. The order allowing this complaint to be made is dated 23rd January 1942, nearly ten months,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 04 1935

Niranjan Lal Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Niranjan Lal

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Dec-04-1935

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1936All141; 160Ind.Cas.870

ORDERAllsop, J.1. This is a reference by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Aligarh, recommending that an order made by a Magistrate in the district of Etah under Section 145, Criminal P.C., should be set aside...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial