Advanced Search Results
Nazim & Ors. versus the State of Uttarakhand
Supreme Court of India
Nazim & Ors.
The State of Uttarakhand
Oct-06-2025
Land Acquisition
[2025]10S.C.R.263
[2025] 10 S.C.R. 263 : 2025 INSC 1184 Nazim & Ors. v. The State of Uttarakhand (Criminal Appeal No. 715 of 2018) 06 October 2025 [M.M. Sundresh and Satish Chandra Sharma,* JJ.] Issue for Consideration Whether...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammed Nazim Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Mohammed Nazim
State of Rajasthan
Mar-14-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 96, 304I and 304II
RLW2003(1)Raj70
Sharma, J.1. This criminal appeal by accused appellant Mohd. Nazim has been preferred against the judgment and order dated September 29, 2000 passed by the Special Judge (Communal Riotes Cases), Tonk by which he convicted the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammed Nazim Vs. State of Raj.
Rajasthan
Mohammed Nazim
State of Raj.
Mar-14-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96 and 304
2002(3)WLC432
Khem Chand Sharma, J.1. This criminal appeal by accused appellant Mohd. Nazim has been preferred against the judgment and order dated September 29, 2000 passed by the Special Judge (Communal Riots Cases), Tonk by which he...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mohd. Nazim and Etc. Vs. State
Allahabad
Mohd. Nazim and Etc.
State
Oct-01-1997
Criminal
Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 5, 7, 8, 8(2), 11, 13, 17, 25, 29, 33 and 44; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(2); Companies Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 161, 165, 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 155(2) and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 491 and 561A; Arms Rules - Rules 4, 25, 25(2) and 25(3); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
1998CriLJ1089
ORDERS.K. Phaujdar, J.1. All these cases have been taken up together as certain common questions of law regarding interpretation of the provisions of the Arms Act, 1959, had cropped up in all these matters. While taking...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNazim Rasool Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Jharkhand
Nazim Rasool Ansari
The State of Jharkhand
Aug-08-2013
Education
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2466 of 2013. ----- Nazim Rasool Ansari @ Nazim Rasool Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Nazim Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Mohd. Nazim Khan
State of Rajasthan
Aug-03-1994
Criminal
1995(2)WLC702; 1994(2)WLN601
Rajendra Saxena, J.1. Heard. Perused the record of the learned lower court.2. This petition filed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been directed against the order dt.8.10.92 passed by the learned Civil Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNazim HussaIn Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Nazim Hussain
State of U.P. and anr.
May-03-1996
FamilyCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 and 145(1)
II(1996)DMC308
G.S.N. Tripathi, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. This is criminal revision Under Section 397, Cr. P.C. A decree was passed Under Section 125, Cr. P.C. in favour of Smt. Shahana Begum, respondent No. 2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNazim vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Delhi
Nazim
The State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Sep-14-2017
Education
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 11.08.2017 Judgment pronounced on:14. 09.2017 CRL.A. 207/2016 RAFIQUE Through Mr.Aditya Guar, Adv. with Mr.Chandan Kumar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNazim vs State Nct of Delhi
Delhi
NAZIM
State Nct of Delhi
May-25-2026
Land Acquisition
* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: May 07, 2026 % Pronounced on: May 25,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNazim Khan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Nazim Khan
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Sep-19-2013
Education
M.Cr.C.No.5809/2013 19.09.2013 Shri Girish Kekre, counsel for the applicant. Shri R.N.Yadav, Panel Lawyer for the respondent Nos.1 to 3/State. None for the respondents No.4 and 5. Heard the learned counsel for the parties finally. The applicant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »