Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: narain das · Respondent: emperor · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.019 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 29 1927

NaraIn Das Vs. King-emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : NaraIn Das

Respondent : King-emperor

Decided on : Mar-29-1927

Subject : CriminalProperty

Reported in : AIR1927All555

Iqbal Ahmad, J.1. This criminal revision and Criminal Revisions Nos. 35 and 36 of 1927 are connected and arise out of one and the same case. The applicants in all the three cases were convicted by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 1927

NaraIn Das Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : NaraIn Das

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Mar-29-1927

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 102Ind.Cas.485

Iqbal Ahmad, J.Missing Tiff Page No. 485note for Rs. 1,500 vis., the difference between the real and the bogus price before the execution of the sale-deed and accordingly Nathu Mal passed a pro-note duly signed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1925

NaraIn Das and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : NaraIn Das and anr.

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Nov-30-1925

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1926All325; 92Ind.Cas.741

Sulaiman, J.1. This is a reference by the Sessions Judge of Cawnpore recommending that the convictions of the accused Narain Das and Chhote Singh and the sentences passed on them should beset aside and they be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 31 1918

Lakhi NaraIn Das and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Lakhi NaraIn Das and ors.

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Jul-31-1918

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : AIR1919Cal460,49Ind.Cas.165

Richardson, J.1. The only questions which arise on this Rule are questions of law. The Rule was not issued on the merits, and on the merits the petitioners have no case.2. There is now ample authority...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 1918

NaraIn Das and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : NaraIn Das and anr.

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Sep-02-1918

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1919All300(1); 51Ind.Cas.351

Tudball, J.1. The applicants have been convicted of criminal trespass under Section 448 of the Indian Penal Code, and have been sentenced to fines of Rs. 10 and Rs. 20, respectively. The Magistrate has written a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial