Advanced Search Results
NaraIn Das Vs. King-emperor
Allahabad
NaraIn Das
King-emperor
Mar-29-1927
CriminalProperty
AIR1927All555
Iqbal Ahmad, J.1. This criminal revision and Criminal Revisions Nos. 35 and 36 of 1927 are connected and arise out of one and the same case. The applicants in all the three cases were convicted by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaraIn Das Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
NaraIn Das
Emperor
Mar-29-1927
Arbitration
102Ind.Cas.485
Iqbal Ahmad, J.Missing Tiff Page No. 485note for Rs. 1,500 vis., the difference between the real and the bogus price before the execution of the sale-deed and accordingly Nathu Mal passed a pro-note duly signed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaraIn Das and anr. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
NaraIn Das and anr.
Emperor
Nov-30-1925
Civil
AIR1926All325; 92Ind.Cas.741
Sulaiman, J.1. This is a reference by the Sessions Judge of Cawnpore recommending that the convictions of the accused Narain Das and Chhote Singh and the sentences passed on them should beset aside and they be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lakhi NaraIn Das and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Lakhi NaraIn Das and ors.
Emperor
Jul-31-1918
Right to Information
AIR1919Cal460,49Ind.Cas.165
Richardson, J.1. The only questions which arise on this Rule are questions of law. The Rule was not issued on the merits, and on the merits the petitioners have no case.2. There is now ample authority...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaraIn Das and anr. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
NaraIn Das and anr.
Emperor
Sep-02-1918
Criminal
AIR1919All300(1); 51Ind.Cas.351
Tudball, J.1. The applicants have been convicted of criminal trespass under Section 448 of the Indian Penal Code, and have been sentenced to fines of Rs. 10 and Rs. 20, respectively. The Magistrate has written a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›