Advanced Search Results
N. Muhammad UssaIn Sahib and anr. Vs. S.N. Abdul Gaffoor Sahib and ors ...
Chennai
N. Muhammad UssaIn Sahib and anr.
S.N. Abdul Gaffoor Sahib and ors.
Aug-05-1949
CivilCompany
Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 48
AIR1950Mad758
Satyanarayana Rao, J.1. This appeal arises out of proceedings for passing of a final decree in a partnership action. The partnership in dispute was commenced on 1st January 1937 under an agreement between three partners, one...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.M.P.L. Palaniappa Chettiar Estate Represented by First Executor, Cho ...
Chennai
N.M.P.L. Palaniappa Chettiar Estate Represented by First Executor, Chokkalingam Chettiar
V.N.S. Ramaswami Naidu and ors.
Aug-10-1945
PropertyCivil
(1945)2MLJ410
1. It seems to us that the question of the assessment of the estate is a, matter of no relevance for determining the right to relief under Madras Act IV of 1938. The estate is not...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Superintending Engineer (Civil) Hydro Project, T.N.E.B., Vs. S. Si ...
Chennai
The Superintending Engineer (Civil) Hydro Project, T.N.E.B., ; the Superintending Engineer, Salem El
S. Sivamani
Nov-04-2004
Labour and Industrial
[2005(104)FLR945]; (2005)IILLJ1127Mad; (2005)1MLJ67
P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. The appellants (hereinafter referred to as 'the Board') are the respondents in W.P. No. 17778 of 1993 filed by the respondent herein (hereinafter referred to as 'the employee') challenging the order dated 21.6.1993,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
N. Krishnan Vs. S.A. Nanjan and anr.
Chennai
N. Krishnan
S.A. Nanjan and anr.
Aug-14-2001
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 9, 138, 139 and 141
[2002]108CompCas849(Mad)
B. Akbar Dasha Khadiri, J. 1. The appellant herein is the complainant before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kothagiri.2. This criminal appeal has arisen in this way :The appellant herein is an Advocate. According to him, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.D.N. Panikar and ors. Vs. S.A.i.L. and anr.
Supreme Court of India
M.D.N. Panikar and ors.
S.A.i.L. and anr.
Sep-02-1986
Labour and Industrial
AIR1987SC1347; (1987)1SCC63
ORDERO. Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. In view of the circumstance that the ministerial staff of F.A. & C.A. O. department is being paid overtime at double the rate of normal wages and in view of the fact...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskO.N.G.C. Ltd. Vs. G.S. Chugani and anr.
Supreme Court of India
O.N.G.C. Ltd.
G.S. Chugani and anr.
Jul-31-1998
Service
Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1959 - Sections 15 and 32
AIR1999SC1784; JT1999(9)SC381; (1999)1SCC194
ORDER1. Special leave granted.2. The respondent was a legal adviser with the appellant-Corporation. He retired from service on 30-6-1991. While the respondent was in service a draft superannuate benefit scheme for the employees of the appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Srinivasachariar Vs. Bhagavathapuram S. Venkatarama Aiyar
Chennai
N. Srinivasachariar
Bhagavathapuram S. Venkatarama Aiyar
Sep-16-1924
Election
(1924)47MLJ762
Jackson, J.1. The facts are fully set out in the order petitioned against. The petitioner was a candidate for election as Councillor in Kumbakonam Municipality when the Chairman received a letter, purporting to be from him...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. N. Parasuram by His Duly Constituted Agent A. P. Narayanan Vs. C. S ...
Chennai
A. N. Parasuram by His Duly Constituted Agent A. P. Narayanan
C. S. Rajavelan and ors.
Apr-04-1974
Municipal TaxTenancy
(1974)2MLJ388
V. Ramaswami, J.1. The appellant is the unsuccessful plaintiff. Respondents 1 to 3 are the owners of Premises No. 24, Halls Road, Madras, of which the appellant is the tenant on a monthly rental of Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.N.A. Abdul Rahiman Rowther Vs. V.S. Sankaran and anr.
Chennai
M.N.A. Abdul Rahiman Rowther
V.S. Sankaran and anr.
Aug-06-1971
Labour & Industrial
(1972)1MLJ164
V. Ramaswami, J.1. The plaintiff is the appellant. He filed a suit for declaration that the award dated 31st May, 1962 made by the Labour Court, Madurai in I.D. No. 42 of 1961 was null and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Kesava Mudaliar Vs. V.S. Govindachariar and ors.
Chennai
N. Kesava Mudaliar
V.S. Govindachariar and ors.
Apr-16-1923
Service Tax
AIR1924Mad231
Schwabe, C.J.1. This is an application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council. The suit was for an injunction and the question mainly turned on the interpretation of an agreement between two, if I may...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »