Advanced Search Results
Murli Pathak Vs. King-emperor
Allahabad
Murli Pathak
King-emperor
May-25-1927
Criminal
AIR1927All707
Dalal, J.1. The only ground worth considering in this application for revision is ground 3, that the alleged defamatory statement having been made by the applicant as an accused person in his defence cannot form the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMurli Dhar and anr. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Murli Dhar and anr.
Emperor
Jan-28-1916
Criminal
AIR1916All330; 33Ind.Cas.643
Piggott, J.1. Murli Dhar and Ganga Saran have been convicted of an offence under Section 228 of the Indian Penal Code in consequence of certain expressions used by them, while occupying the position of accused persons,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMurli Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Murli
Emperor
Jul-08-1929
Criminal
AIR1929All720
Niamatullah, J.1. Heard the learned Assistant Government Advocate. I have no hesitation in accepting the reference made by the learned Sessions Judge, who has rightly referred to the provisions of Rule 35, U.P. Arms Rules and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›