Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: murli · Respondent: emperor · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.009 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 25 1927

Murli Pathak Vs. King-emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Murli Pathak

Respondent : King-emperor

Decided on : May-25-1927

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1927All707

Dalal, J.1. The only ground worth considering in this application for revision is ground 3, that the alleged defamatory statement having been made by the applicant as an accused person in his defence cannot form the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1916

Murli Dhar and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Murli Dhar and anr.

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Jan-28-1916

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1916All330; 33Ind.Cas.643

Piggott, J.1. Murli Dhar and Ganga Saran have been convicted of an offence under Section 228 of the Indian Penal Code in consequence of certain expressions used by them, while occupying the position of accused persons,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1929

Murli Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Murli

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Jul-08-1929

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1929All720

Niamatullah, J.1. Heard the learned Assistant Government Advocate. I have no hesitation in accepting the reference made by the learned Sessions Judge, who has rightly referred to the provisions of Rule 35, U.P. Arms Rules and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial