Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: mohd umar · Respondent: the state · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.029 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 20 1983

Mohd. Umar Vs. State of M.P. Through Central Excise

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Appellant : Mohd. Umar ;s/O Noor Mohd.

Respondent : State of M.P. Through Central Excise

Decided on : Jun-20-1983

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1986(7)LC339(MP)

ORDER1. All these Criminal Revisions are inter-connected. The nature of offences are the same, as also the basic facts are also identical.2. The petitioner was prosecuted for offences under Section 468 and 471 I.P.C. as also...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 1981

Mohd. Umar Mohd. Haroon Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : Mohd. Umar Mohd. Haroon

Respondent : State of Rajasthan and ors.

Decided on : Mar-27-1981

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : 1981WLN(UC)166

M.C. Jain, J.1. The facts giving rise to the present writ petition may briefly be stated as under. The petitioner-firm has been assessed for Rajasthan Sales Tax and Central Sales Tax for two years from 1-4-77...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 2018

mohd.umar vs.the State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : mohd.umar

Respondent : The State

Decided on : Jan-18-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : JANUARY18 2018 + Crl.Rev.P.823/2017 and Crl.M.B.1916/2017 MOHD.UMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.U.M.Tripathi, Advocate. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Tarang Srivastava,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 13 1987

Mohd. Umar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : Mohd. Umar

Respondent : State of Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-13-1987

Subject : Food AdulterationCriminal

Reported in : 1989WLN(UC)504

N.C. Sharma, J.1. This is a revision by Mohammad Umar against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Baran dated August 9, 1982 passed in criminal appeal No. 164 of 1981 of his Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 1995

Mohd. Umar Khan Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Mohd. Umar Khan

Respondent : The State of Haryana and ors.

Decided on : Jul-20-1995

Subject : ConstitutionProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Administration of Evacuee Property, Act 1950 - Sections 8(2A)

Reported in : (1996)112PLR119

N.K. Kapoor, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of the writ petition as well as R.S.A. Nos. 1787 and 1788 of 1993.2. Petitioner has sought issuance of a writ of Certiorari to quash order dated 26.11.1984, annexure...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2015

Mohd. Umar and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Another

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Appellant : Mohd. Umar and Others

Respondent : State of Rajasthan and Another

Decided on : Jul-15-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

By Cr Misc Petition No.3560/2014, challenge is made to the order dated 29.5.2014, passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Jaipur Metropolitan, dismissing the application moved by the petitioners for declaring the proceedings taken against them...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1995

Saiyad Mohd. Saiyad Umar Saiyad and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Saiyad Mohd. Saiyad Umar Saiyad and ors.

Respondent : State of Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-03-1995

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 50 and 54; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65 and 66; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : 1995(43)BLJR1049; 1995CriLJ2662; 1995(2)Crimes182(SC); 1995(50)ECC117; 1995(78)ELT649(SC); (1995)2GLR1315; JT1995(3)SC489; 1995(2)SCALE576; (1995)3SCC610; [1995]3SCR117; [1

S.P. Bharucha, J.1. Special leave granted.2. The appeal is directed against the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat. The High Court upheld the conviction of the appellants for offences...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial