Advanced Search Results
Mohd. Umar Vs. State of M.P. Through Central Excise
Madhya Pradesh
Mohd. Umar ;s/O Noor Mohd.
State of M.P. Through Central Excise
Jun-20-1983
Excise
1986(7)LC339(MP)
ORDER1. All these Criminal Revisions are inter-connected. The nature of offences are the same, as also the basic facts are also identical.2. The petitioner was prosecuted for offences under Section 468 and 471 I.P.C. as also...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Umar Mohd. Haroon Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Mohd. Umar Mohd. Haroon
State of Rajasthan and ors.
Mar-27-1981
Sales Tax/VAT
1981WLN(UC)166
M.C. Jain, J.1. The facts giving rise to the present writ petition may briefly be stated as under. The petitioner-firm has been assessed for Rajasthan Sales Tax and Central Sales Tax for two years from 1-4-77...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askmohd.umar vs.the State
Delhi
mohd.umar
The State
Jan-18-2018
Land Acquisition
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : JANUARY18 2018 + Crl.Rev.P.823/2017 and Crl.M.B.1916/2017 MOHD.UMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.U.M.Tripathi, Advocate. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Tarang Srivastava,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mohd. Umar Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Mohd. Umar
State of Rajasthan
Jan-13-1987
Food AdulterationCriminal
1989WLN(UC)504
N.C. Sharma, J.1. This is a revision by Mohammad Umar against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Baran dated August 9, 1982 passed in criminal appeal No. 164 of 1981 of his Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Umar Khan Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Mohd. Umar Khan
The State of Haryana and ors.
Jul-20-1995
ConstitutionProperty
Constitution of India - Article 226; Administration of Evacuee Property, Act 1950 - Sections 8(2A)
(1996)112PLR119
N.K. Kapoor, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of the writ petition as well as R.S.A. Nos. 1787 and 1788 of 1993.2. Petitioner has sought issuance of a writ of Certiorari to quash order dated 26.11.1984, annexure...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Umar and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Another
Rajasthan Jodhpur
Mohd. Umar and Others
State of Rajasthan and Another
Jul-15-2015
Land Acquisition
By Cr Misc Petition No.3560/2014, challenge is made to the order dated 29.5.2014, passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Jaipur Metropolitan, dismissing the application moved by the petitioners for declaring the proceedings taken against them...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaiyad Mohd. Saiyad Umar Saiyad and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat
Supreme Court of India
Saiyad Mohd. Saiyad Umar Saiyad and ors.
State of Gujarat
Apr-03-1995
NarcoticsCriminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 50 and 54; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 65 and 66; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114
1995(43)BLJR1049; 1995CriLJ2662; 1995(2)Crimes182(SC); 1995(50)ECC117; 1995(78)ELT649(SC); (1995)2GLR1315; JT1995(3)SC489; 1995(2)SCALE576; (1995)3SCC610; [1995]3SCR117; [1
S.P. Bharucha, J.1. Special leave granted.2. The appeal is directed against the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat. The High Court upheld the conviction of the appellants for offences...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›