Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: mohd islam · Respondent: state · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.027 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 01 1992

Mohd. Islam Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Mohd. Islam

Respondent : State of U.P.

Decided on : Oct-01-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161, 218, 313 and 464

Reported in : 1993CriLJ1736

G.P. Mathur, J.1. Mohd. Islam alias Aslam has filed the present appeal from Jail against the judgment and order dated 19-9-1990 of VIII Addl. Sessions Judge, Varanasi in Sessions Trial No. 182 of 1989 and Sessions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 2013

Mohd.islam Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Mohd.islam

Respondent : State

Decided on : Sep-17-2013

Subject : Criminal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:10.09.2013 Judgment delivered on:17.09.2013 CRL.A. 1064/2010 MOHD. ISLAM .... Appellant Through Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. versus STATE Through + ..... Respondent Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2001

Mohd. Islam Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Mohd. Islam

Respondent : State (Nct of Delhi)

Decided on : May-22-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(1)

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4317; 93(2001)DLT764; 2001(59)DRJ426

ORDERUsha Mehra, J.1. A document as valuable as a dying declaration is supposed to be fool-proof, it must incorporate the particulars which it is supposed to contain. A dying declaration enjoys almost a sacrosanct status as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 17 2014

Mohd. Islam Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Mohd. Islam

Respondent : The State

Decided on : Jan-17-2014

Subject : Education

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:17.01.2014. CRL.REV.P. 685/2013 & Crl. M.(B) No.2402/2013 MOHD. ISLAM ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Haneef Mohammad, Adv. versus THE STATE Through ..... Respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2011

Mohd Islam Vs. State, Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Mohd Islam

Respondent : State, Nct of Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, (NDPS) Act - Sections 21, 29; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 4, 6

1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 15.11.2010 in NDPS case N No.18/2004 ID No.02403R0197862009 FIR No.72/2009 P.S. Crime Branch under Section 21/29 NDPS Act and consequent order on sentence dated 16.11.2010 whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2010

Mohd. Islam Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Mohd. Islam

Respondent : State

Decided on : Apr-30-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 293 and 313

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. With reference to the testimony of Kumari Gulnar aged 10 years when she deposed in Court on 24.3.2005 and was aged about 8 1/2 years when the crime took place on 13.10.2003, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 1998

Mohd. Islam Siddiqui and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Mohd. Islam Siddiqui and Another

Respondent : State of U.P. and Others

Decided on : Sep-07-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Subordinate Civil Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947 - Rules 11, 12 and 15; Uttar Pradesh Rules for Recruitment of Ministerial Staff of the Subordinate Offices Rules, 1950 - Rules 4, 5 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 235 and 309; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 241

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC225; (1998)3UPLBEC2071

M. Katju, J.1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sunil Ambwani appearing for the High Court and for the District Judge, Mainpuri.2. This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial