Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: mohd anas · Respondent: state · Page 1 of about 2 results (0.010 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 08 2016

mohd.anas vs.state

Court : Delhi

Appellant : mohd.anas

Respondent : State

Decided on : Nov-08-2016

Subject : Criminal

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON : NOVEMBER08 2016 BAIL APPLN.1126/2016 MOHD.ANAS ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Waseem Ahmed, Advocate. STATE versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2005

Mohd. Rizwan Mohd. Isaq @ Laddowala Vs. the State of Maharashtra (at t ...

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Mohd. Rizwan Mohd. Isaq @ Laddowala;mohd. Hassan Mohd. Anas @ Hassan

Respondent : The State of Maharashtra (at the Instance of Dcb, Cid) and the Chief Secretary of the State of Mahar

Decided on : Oct-24-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 19, 20, 28, 34, 40, 46, 50, 60, 60(4), 60(5), 60(6) and 60(7); Explosive Substance Act; Arms Act; Damage to Public Property Act; Indian Penal Code; Prevention of Terrorism (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 60 and 60(1); Prevention of Terrorism (Repeal) Act, 2004 - Sections 2, 2(3) and 2(5); Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act, 1987; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 321; Constitution of India - Article 134C; Prevention of Terrorism (Repeal) Ordinance, 2004

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR1056

Ranjana Desai. J. 1. Rule in Criminal Writ Petition No. 2363 of 2005 and Criminal Appeal No. 789 of 2005 is admitted. The respondents waive service. By consent of the parties, taken up for hearing forthwith.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial