Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: mithan lal · Respondent: state · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.026 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 05 1976

Mithan Lal Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, U.P., Lucknow and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Mithan Lal

Respondent : State Transport Appellate Tribunal, U.P., Lucknow and ors.

Decided on : Jan-05-1976

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47 and 64; Motor Vehicles (U.P. Amendment) Act, 1972; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1976All286

K.N. Seth, J. 1. In October, 1965, a number of routes in Meerut and Bareilly Regions were amalgamated and an inter-regional route Meerut-Mowana-Miranpur-Bijnor-Lawan-Phalauda - Khatauli was created. One Ganga Saran held a permanent stage carriage permit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2002

Mithan Lal Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Mithan Lal

Respondent : State

Decided on : Apr-22-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 345, 346, 349, 351, 397, 161 and 401; Delhi Lands (Restrictions on Transfer) Act, 1972 - Sections 3 and 9; Evidence Act - Sections 65

Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)55; 2002CriLJ3422; 97(2002)DLT1004; 2002(63)DRJ529

ORDERBy this order, I shall decide as to whether PW Mithanlal is guilty under Section 349 Cr.P.C. or not.The respondent Mithanlal was cited as witness and he was holding the original documents, i.e., Gift deed of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 1967

Mithan Lal Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : Mithan Lal

Respondent : The State

Decided on : Apr-12-1967

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1968CriLJ431

Kansingh, J.1. Appellant Mithanlal who was convicted by the Special Judge, Gangapur, for an offence under Section 161, I.P.C. and sentenced to six months' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/- and in default further...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 21 1976

Mithan Lal Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Mithan Lal

Respondent : State

Decided on : Sep-21-1976

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 1977CriLJ150; ILR1977Delhi72; 1976RLR652

Prithvi Raj, J.(1) By this application (Cr. M. 1111 of 197(2) The review is sought on the ground that Shrimati Laxmi Devi,prosecutrix, after the dismissal of the petitioner's revision petition hadcompounded the offence under section 354...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1979

Mithan Lal Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Mithan Lal

Respondent : State of Haryana and anr.

Decided on : Aug-24-1979

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1980CriLJ338

ORDERA.S. Bains, J.1. The petitioner is facing trial under Section 409, I. P. C. He had challenged the order of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hissar dated 14-5-1979, which is as follows;-Heard. The entries in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2000

Mithan Lal Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Mithan Lal

Respondent : State

Decided on : Aug-21-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379

Reported in : 2000(57)DRJ48

R.S. Sodhi, J.1. By this Criminal Revision Petition No. 340 of 1999 the petitioner seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 6.9.1999 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 1999...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 1958

Mithan Lal Vs. the State of Delhi and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Mithan Lal

Respondent : The State of Delhi and anr.

Decided on : Apr-07-1958

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Sections 2 and 4; Constitution of India - Article 246(4) and 248(2); States (Laws) act, 1950 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1958SC682; [1959]1SCR445; [1958]9STC417(SC)

Venkatarama Aiyar, J.1. The petitioners are building contractors carrying on business in Delhi, and they have filed the present applications under Art. 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity of certain provisions of the Bengal Finance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial