Advanced Search Results

Manisha vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Manisha

Respondent : State & Anr.

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"13th February, 2019 + CRL.M.C. 362/2018 MANISHA STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arjun Malik, Advocate versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja,...

Manisha Sirohi & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Manisha Sirohi & Ors.

Respondent : State & Anr.

Subject : Education

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: November 07, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 1792/2019 MANISHA SIROHI & ORS. Through: Mr. Arpit Bhalla, Advocate ........ Petitioners STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Versus...

M/S. Manisha Creations Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : M/S. Manisha Creations

Respondent : State of West Bengal and anr.

Subject : Education

ORDER SHEET WP1019OF2013IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.MANISHA CREATIONS Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 3rd October, 2013. Appearance : Mr.Somak...

Manisha Palace Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Manisha Palace

Respondent : State of U.P. and anr.

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cinematograph Act, 1918 - Sections 13; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC1697

M. Katju, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed for a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned G.O. dated 14.5.1992 Annexure-4 to the writ petition and the order of the District Magistrate, Hamirpur of...

Manisha W/O Madhukar Mate Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr. and Shrira ...

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Manisha W/O Madhukar Mate

Respondent : State of Maharashtra and anr. and Shriram S/O Sitaram Nathe

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 156, 156(2), 156(3), 190(1), 200, 201, 202 and 482

Reported in : 2008(1)MhLj130

C.L. Pangarkar, J.1. Applicant accused seeks to quash the complaint case and the F.I.R. registered on the basis of the complaint at the directions of the Magistrate.2. Facts of the case are as follows:Applicant was elected...

Manisha Verma and ors. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Appellant : Manisha Verma and ors.

Respondent : State of Uttarakhand and anr.

Subject : CivilService

V.K. Bist, J. I.A. No. 182 of 2010 (Urgency Application)1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties on the urgency application and perused the record.2. Urgency application is allowed.WPSB No. 9 of 2010: 3. Heard.4. Admit the...