Advanced Search Results
Mangal and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Mangal and anr.
State of Madhya Pradesh
Jun-29-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 323
2004(3)MPHT438
S.P. Khare, J.1. Appellant Mangal has been convicted under Section 302, Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life. Appellant Chironjilal has been convicted under Section 323, Indian Penal Code and sentenced to the period...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMangal Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Supreme Court of India
Mangal Singh
State of U.P.
Jul-16-1974
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302
AIR1975SC76; 1975CriLJ36; (1975)3SCC290; 1974(6)LC465(SC)
Khanna, J.1. Mangal Singh (50) was convicted by learned Additional Sessions Judge Aligarh under Section 302 Indian Penal Code for causing the death of Longehri (35) and was sentenced to death. On appeal and reference the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMangal Tudu and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Jharkhand
Mangal Tudu and ors.
The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Feb-08-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 379
2007(2)BLJR1313
1. All the appellants stand convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and three years respectively, by the 6th Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mangal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
Mangal Singh and ors.
State of Bihar
Sep-02-2005
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 149 and 302; Arms Act - Sections 27
AIR2005SC3269; 2005(3)BLJR2179; 2005CriLJ3755; [2005(4)JCR137(SC)]; (2005)13SCC205
K.G. Balakrishnan, J.1. Seven accused persons were found guilty by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya, for the offence of murder punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC. Some of the accused were found guilty...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMangal Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Mangal Singh and anr.
The State of Rajasthan
Jan-07-1971
Criminal
1971WLN23
Kan Singh, J.1. Accused Mangal Singh and Sahab Singh were convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge No. 1, Dholpur of offences under Sections 326 and 326 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code respectively Each one...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMangal Munda Vs. State of West Bengal
Kolkata
Mangal Munda
State of West Bengal
Dec-03-2009
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 396 and 411; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 164
Debiprasad Sengupta, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 31.08.2004 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. I, Alipurduar in Sessions Case No. 61...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMangal Mazumdar Vs. State of Assam
Guwahati
Mangal Mazumdar
State of Assam
Nov-13-2007
Criminal
P.K. Musahary, J.1. Heard Mr. J.M. Choudhury, Learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, assisted by Mr. N.P. Das and Mr. P.C. Gayan, Learned Public Prosecutor, Assam.2. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMangal Alias Bhotu Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Mangal Alias Bhotu
State of U.P.
Oct-08-1999
Criminal
Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act - Sections 3(2)(1); Essential Commodities Act, 1993; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 82 and 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 201, 302, 364A, 365, 402 and 412
2000CriLJ3003
1. The aforesaid three appeals and the death reference arise out of the judgment in S.T. No. 43 of 1995 dated 2-5-1998 recorded by the Spl. Judge (Dacoity Affected Area), Banda. By his judgment and order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMangal SaIn Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Mangal Sain
The State of Punjab and anr.
May-21-1951
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311; Punjab Municipal (Executive Officer) Act, 1931 - Sections 3(7) and 3(9)
AIR1952P& H58
Harnam Singh, J. 1. In order to appreciate the points which we are called upon to determine in Civil Miscellaneous No. 747 of 1950 the facts, so far as material, may be set out in some...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBasti Ram Mangal Vs. State of Raj. and ors.
Rajasthan
Basti Ram Mangal
State of Raj. and ors.
Apr-30-1991
Constitution
1991(2)WLC564; 1991(1)WLN270
J.R. Chopra, J.1. This writ petition is initially filed by the petitioner against the State of Rajasthan, The Chief Engineer Public Works Department Rajasthan, Jaipur and Shri J.K. Soni on 6.1.1987 alongwith number of annexures and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »