Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: m · Respondent: v s · Page 1 of about 98 results (0.078 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 10 2009

Bharat Credit Co-operative Society Represented by Its Chairman, K.M. N ...

Court : Karnataka

Appellant : Bharat Credit Co-operative Society Represented by Its Chairman, K.M. Narasimhaiah S/O. Narasimhaiah

Respondent : Umakant S/O. Muniayappa, ;chandrakant V. Naik S/O. Venkataraman V. Nayak, Manager and ;k.C. Sumithra

Decided on : Jun-10-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200, 249, 320, 408 and 465; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 379, 381, 405, 408, 465 and 468

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3218

ORDERA.S. Pachhapure, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 10.7.2007 passed by the Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, discharging the respondents, the accused before the Trial Court under Section 249 of Cr.P.C.2. The facts relevant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2016

M/s. Kanagadhara Spinning Mills Private Limited Vs. M/s. T.V.S. Financ ...

Court : Chennai

Appellant : M/s. Kanagadhara Spinning Mills Private Limited

Respondent : M/s. T.V.S. Finance and Service Ltd.,

Decided on : Aug-26-2016

Subject : Education

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Order and Decree made in I.A.No.53 of 2010 in O.S.No.68 of 2007 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Vellore,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1936

K.M. Ramakrishna Mudaliar Vs. V.S.V. Manikka Mudaliar (Deceased) and o ...

Court : Chennai

Appellant : K.M. Ramakrishna Mudaliar

Respondent : V.S.V. Manikka Mudaliar (Deceased) and ors.

Decided on : Sep-25-1936

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1937Mad375; (1937)1MLJ587

Varadachariar, J.1. This appeal arises out of a mortgagee s suit for sale. The mortgage document (Ex. A) which was executed by the first defendant on 25th September, 1915, comprised properties which it appears from several...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 30 2008

Sri V.T. Jayavelu S/O V.M. Thirugnana Chetty Vs. Sri Nisar Ahmed S/O L ...

Court : Karnataka

Appellant : Sri V.T. Jayavelu S/O V.M. Thirugnana Chetty;sri Nisar Ahmed S/O Late Sheik Mahaboob

Respondent : Sri Nisar Ahmed S/O Late Sheik Mahaboob;sri V.T. Jayavelu S/O V.M. Thirugnana Chetty

Decided on : May-30-2008

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act - Sections 2(2), 3, 21, 21(1) and 31; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Karnataka Small Causes Courts Act, 1964 - Sections 8, 8(1), 8(2) and 9 - Schedule - Article 4; Karnataka Rent Act; Small Causes Courts Act

Reported in : 2008(4)KCCR2312; 2008(5)AIRKarR378; AIR2008NOC2824

Subhash B. Adi, J.1. This is defendant's appeal against the judgment and decree dated 13th December 2002 in O.S. No. 15131/1999.2. The parties will be referred to as arrayed before the trial court.3. Respondent - plaintiff...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1963

K.M. Shanmugam Vs. the S.R.V.S. (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : K.M. Shanmugam

Respondent : The S.R.V.S. (P) Ltd. and ors.

Decided on : Feb-06-1963

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 43A, 47 and 47(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1963SC1626; [1964]1SCR809

Subba Rao, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of adivision Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Madras confirming that asingle Judge of that Court allowing the petition filed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1925

M.R.M. Ramasawmy Chetty Vs. V.S. Chengalroya Pillai

Court : Chennai

Appellant : M.R.M. Ramasawmy Chetty

Respondent : V.S. Chengalroya Pillai

Decided on : Sep-09-1925

Subject : Contract

Reported in : AIR1926Mad380

ORDERJackson, J.1. Petition to revise the judgment and sentence of the 2nd Presidency Magistrate in C.C. 20052 of 1924.2. The petitioner sold his business to certain persons under a contract dated 1st October 1922. On 7th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1925

M.R.M. Ramasami Chetty, Managing Director of M.R.M. Ramasami Chetti an ...

Court : Chennai

Appellant : M.R.M. Ramasami Chetty, Managing Director of M.R.M. Ramasami Chetti and Co. Ltd.

Respondent : V.S. Chengalraya Pillai

Decided on : Sep-09-1925

Subject : Company

Reported in : 94Ind.Cas.892

ORDERJackson, J.1. Petition to revise the judgment and sentence of the Second Presidency Magistrate, in C.C. No. 20052 of 1924.2. The petitioner sold his business to certain persons under a contract dated 1st October 1922. On...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2010

Seema K.B.,d/O.Babu K.M. Vs. Prakash K.V.,s/O.Late Kunjambu

Court : Kerala

Appellant : Seema K.B.,d/O.Babu K.M.

Respondent : Prakash K.V.,s/O.Late Kunjambu

Decided on : Nov-24-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

R.BASANT & K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.O.P.(F.C) No.853 of 2010Dated this the 24th day of November 20101. The petitioner, who has initiated proceedings for divorce before the Family Court against the respondent - her husband, by filing O.P.No.2013...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 1971

M.N.A. Abdul Rahiman Rowther Vs. V.S. Sankaran and anr.

Court : Chennai

Appellant : M.N.A. Abdul Rahiman Rowther

Respondent : V.S. Sankaran and anr.

Decided on : Aug-06-1971

Subject : Labour & Industrial

Reported in : (1972)1MLJ164

V. Ramaswami, J.1. The plaintiff is the appellant. He filed a suit for declaration that the award dated 31st May, 1962 made by the Labour Court, Madurai in I.D. No. 42 of 1961 was null and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2010

M/S.Gloria Films. Vs. V.S.Sudhir Kumar.

Court : Kerala

Appellant : M/S.Gloria Films.

Respondent : V.S.Sudhir Kumar.

Decided on : Nov-30-2010

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act - Section 141

1. The second defendant in a suit for recovery of money, is the appellant. 2. The plaintiff commenced production of a cinematographic film. He, thereafter, transferred his interest in favour of the first defendant for consideration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial