Advanced Search Results

Kanwar Singh vs.state (Nct) of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Kanwar Singh

Respondent : State (Nct) of Delhi

Subject : Criminal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.A. 521/2018 1. MEERA DEVI Judgment delivered on:22. d November, 2019 ...Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms. Katyayini and Mr. Shubham Gupta,...

Kanwar Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Kanwar Singh

Respondent : State of Haryana and Others

Subject : Right to Information

C.M.No.2434-35 of 2014 and CWP No.322 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH106 C.M.Nos.2434-35 of 2014 and CWP No.322 of 2014 Date of Decision : March 10, 2014 Kanwar Singh...

Kanwar Singh and anr. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Appellant : Kanwar Singh and anr.

Respondent : State of Uttarakhand and anr.

Subject : Criminal

Alok Singh, J.1. Mr. Sandeep Tandon, learned Counsel for the applicants/petitioners.2. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent No. 1.3. Mr. Vinod Sharma, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2.4. Heard.5. Present...

Kanwar Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Kanwar Singh

Respondent : State

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 04, 2014 Decision on: April 16, 2014 CRL.A. No.256 of 2008 KANWAR SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Sima Gulati, Ms. Ridhima Gulati & Mr....

Kanwar Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Kanwar Singh and anr.

Respondent : The State of Haryana and anr.

Subject : Education

Criminal Misc.not M-19263 of 2013 {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.not M-19263 of 2013 Date of Decision:09. h September, 2013 Kanwar Singh & Anr...Petitioners Versus The State of Haryana...

Sunita Kaushik Wife of Sh. Kanwar Singh Advocate Vill. Hirapur, Vs. St ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Sunita Kaushik Wife of Sh. Kanwar Singh Advocate Vill. Hirapur,

Respondent : State of Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

RFA No.797 and 798 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1 RFA No.797 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision:01. 05.2013 Sunita Kaushik, wife of Sh. Kanwar Singh Advocate, Vill. Hirapur, Distt. Faridabad.....Appellant...

Shri Kanwar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : Shri Kanwar Singh

Respondent : State of Rajasthan and ors.

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(2)WLN473

Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order of his removal dt. 26.02.1992. Petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Constable in...

Kanwar Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Kanwar Singh and Others

Respondent : State of Haryana and Others

Subject : Education

CWP No.25634 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.25634 of 2012 Date of Decision : December 20, 2012 Kanwar Singh and others ...PETITIONERS versus State of Haryana and others ....RESPONDENTS...

Kanwar Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Kanwar Singh and Another

Respondent : State of Haryana and Others

Subject : Land Acquisition

CWP No.1708 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.1708 of 2013 Date of decision:28. 01.2013 Kanwar Singh and another -----Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and others ----Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR....

Kanwar Singh Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Kanwar Singh

Respondent : State of Haryana and ors.

Subject : Service

Reported in : JT1997(3)SC732; (1997)IILLJ34SC; 1997(3)SCALE177; (1997)4SCC662; [1997]2SCR617

ORDER1. Delay condoned. 2. This special leave petition arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, made on October 1, 1996 in CWP No. 15380/96. 3. Admittedly, the petitioner...