Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: jan mohammad · Respondent: state · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.021 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 31 1962

Jan Mohammad Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Jan Mohammad

Respondent : State

Decided on : Jul-31-1962

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 367(5), 374, 376 and 423; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : AIR1963All501; 1963CriLJ481

Srivastava, J.1. This is an appeal by Jan Mohammad who has been convicted under Sections 302 and 307, I.P.C. by the Civil and Sessions Judge of Mirzapur. For the former offence he has been sentenced to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1965

Jan Mohammad Noor Mohammad Begban Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Jan Mohammad Noor Mohammad Begban

Respondent : State of Gujarat and anr.

Decided on : Aug-18-1965

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1964 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 6[2], 6[3], 27, 27[2], 30 and 59; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19[1], 31, 32, 301 and 304; Bombay Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1939 - Sections 4, 4A, 5, 5A, 5AA, 6[3], 11, 26, 26[1], 26[5] and 64; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 87; Bombay Reorganisation Ordinance, 1961; Bombay Agricultural produce Market Rules, 1941 - Rule 53; Madras Commercial Croporations Market Act, 1933; Bombay and Saurashtra Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961; Gujarat and Saurashtra Agricultural Produce Markets (Amendment and Validating Provisions) Act

Reported in : AIR1966SC385; [1966]1SCR505

Shah, J. 1. By this petition the petitioner seeks to restrain the State of Gujarat from enforcing the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act 20 of 1964, on the plea that certain provisions of the Act infringe...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1997

Jan Mohammad Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : Jan Mohammad

Respondent : State of Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-29-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1729

G.L. Gupta, J.1. Through these appeals-- represented appeal and jail appeal Jan Mohd. has called in question his conviction under Section 302, IPC recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bikaner vide judgment dt. 29-4-1994.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 20 2009

Amir Hamja, Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Appellant : Amir Hamja, ;jan Mohammad @ Jainuddin, ;dost Mohammad and Bhutkul Miya @ Bhatu Mian

Respondent : The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Decided on : Jan-20-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 146, 149, 302, 323, 426 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2753

1. The appellants along with the other four accused persons, were prosecuted for the charge under Sections 147, 146, 149, 323, 426, 452, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. On conclusion of the trial,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 2009

Zakirunnissa W/O Late Nawab Jan, Vs. State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Se ...

Court : Karnataka

Appellant : Zakirunnissa W/O Late Nawab Jan, ;s. Rajashekar S/O Subasli Raj and Nissar Ahmed S/O Aydam Mohammad

Respondent : State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Secretary Commerce and Industries Department and ors.

Decided on : Jun-11-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 - Sections 2(7), 3(1), 28(4) and 28(6); Mysore Tramways Act, 1906 - Sections 3(5), 4, 5, 7(2), 7(3) and 47A; Land Acquisition Act; Indian Tramways Act, 1886 - Sections 3(5); Constitution of India -Article 372

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3392:2009(4)KCCR2895:2009(6)AIRKarR252.

ORDERMohan Shantanagoudar, J.1. Petitioners have questioned the Notification vide Annexure-'F' dated 17.1.2006 issued by the 3rd respondent- The Special Land Acquisition Officer under Section 3(1) of the Karnataka industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial