Advanced Search Results
Jamil and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
Rajasthan
Jamil and ors.
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
May-17-2007
Criminal
RLW2007(4)Raj3373
Narendra Kumar Jain, J.1. These five appeals, on behalf of seven accused persons, namely, (1) Jamil S/o Jahur Shah, (2) Siddiq S/o Mohamood Meo, (3) Netram S/o Shri Basanti Lal, (4) Rajendra S/o Sampat Ram, (5)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd Jamil vs.state
Delhi
Mohd Jamil
State
Sep-14-2017
Criminal
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 11, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: September 14, 2017 CRL.A. 669/2017 MOHD JAMIL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anwesh Madhukar, Advocate with Mr.Pranjal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJamil @ Jamir vs.state (Govt Nct of Delhi)
Delhi
Jamil @ Jamir
State (Govt Nct of Delhi)
Jan-19-2018
Criminal
$~ * + + + Versus Crl.As.1226/2013, 1383/2013, 1460/2013 & 1581/2013 Page 1 of 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1226/2013 Reserved on:3. d January, 2018 Decided on:19. h January, 2018...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Arshad Jamil. Vs. State of Uttarkhand and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Arshad Jamil.
State of Uttarkhand and ors.
Sep-07-2011
Election
Representation of Peoples Act, 1950 - Section 21, 20; Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 - Rule 7
1. Leave Granted. 2. By this Judgment and Order, we propose to dispose of three appeals, arising out of SLP (C) No. 25203 of 2008 filed by the appellant herein against the order dated 13.8.2008, SLP...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJamil Fihmed @ Sadalalu Abdul Jamil Qf Ureshi @ Jamil Mohd. Abdul Maji ...
Mumbai
Jamil Fihmed @ Sadalalu Abdul Jamil Qureshi @ Jamil Mohd. Abdul Majid Qureshi
The State of Maharashtra
Jul-08-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 113, 114, 224, 302, 320 and 333; Arms Act - Sections 4 and 25; Bombay Police Act - Sections 37 and 135; Evidence Act
2003(2)ALD(Cri)128
J.G. Chitre, J.1. Smt. Pratibha Patil for the appellant and Shri Shringarpure, A.P.P. for the prosecution. Both of them have been heard at length.2. The appellant is hereby assailing correctness, propriety and legality of the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJamil Ahmed Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi
Delhi
Jamil Ahmed
State (Nct) of Delhi
Jul-31-2013
Education
$~R-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.237/2010 Judgment reserved on 1st July, 2013. Judgment delivered on 31st July, 2013 % JAMIL AHMED Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Sumer Kumar Sethi, Advocate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJamil and ors. Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Jamil and ors.
State of Haryana
Feb-25-2010
Criminal
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J.1. The present revision petition has been preferred by three petitioners, namely, Jamil, Hakku and Ashu sons of Chhajju. They were named as accused in case FIR No. 244 dated 16.12.1995 registered at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJamil and ors. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jamil and ors.
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Jun-21-2013
Criminal
Cr.A. No.780/2001 Page No.1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.780 OF 200.APPELLANTS:1. Jamil S/o Mohd. Hussain Aged about 35 years, R/o Dashmesh Nagar, Bhopal (MP)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJamil Vs. the State
Delhi
Jamil
The State
Mar-05-1982
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161
22(1982)DLT40
Charanjit Talwar, J.(1) The parents of Kumari Geeta, the proiecutrix, are sweepers. According to the prosecution they used to work in a part of the locality of Gali Takia Razan, Sheesh Mahal, Teliwara, situated on Shivaji...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJamil Akhtar @ Md. Jamil Akhtar Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.
Jharkhand
Jamil Akhtar @ Md. Jamil Akhtar
The State of Jharkhand and anr.
Mar-26-2009
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 227, 239, 244, 245 and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 323, 324, 379, 406, 420, 494, 497 and 511
2009(57)BLJR2160
ORDERJaya Roy, J.1. This revision application is directed against the order dated 27.8.2008 passed in complaint case No. 43 of 2003 by the court of Shri Rakesh Kumar Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, whereby the petition filed under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »