Advanced Search Results
Jafar Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Jafar
Emperor
May-31-1916
Criminal
AIR1916All253(2); 36Ind.Cas.577
Sunder Lal, J.1. The appellant Jafar was found selling some spices in the bazar by two chaukidars, who suspected him of possessing stolen property and of attempting to dispose of the same. He was arrested by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJafar HusaIn and anr. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Jafar HusaIn and anr.
Emperor
Mar-22-1933
Criminal
AIR1933All859; 147Ind.Cas.551
ORDERKendall, J.1. The application made by the two applicants is that the proceedings instituted against them under Section 110, Criminal P.C., may be quashed. On 10th December 1932 the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Khurja issued a notice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJafar Ali Howladar Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Jafar Ali Howladar
Emperor
Feb-02-1910
Criminal
6Ind.Cas.668
1. This is a rule calling on the District Magistrate to show cause why the securities offered by the petitioner should not be accepted. The petitioner has been ordered to be bound down under Section 118,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jafar Ali Panjalia Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Jafar Ali Panjalia
Emperor
Feb-02-1910
Criminal
(1910)ILR37Cal446
Stephen and Carnduff, JJ.1. This is a rule calling on the District Magistrate to show cause why the securities offered by the petitioner should not be accepted. The petitioner has been ordered to be bound down...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJafar HusaIn and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Jafar HusaIn and ors.
Emperor
Sep-14-1923
Criminal
81Ind.Cas.442
Sulaiman, J.1. This is an application in revision. The first point taken, is that the learned District Magistrate has under an oversight rejected the application filed before him summarily and has not considered the case on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›