Advanced Search Results
In Re: Ponnuswami Udayar and anr.
Chennai
In Re: Ponnuswami Udayar and anr.
Sep-25-1928
Land Acquisition
115Ind.Cas.481
ORDERCurgenven, J.1. The two petitioners filed this Criminal Revision Petition against the order of the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Tirukovilur, dated 6th October, 1927, deciding to continue the criminal case filed against them by the Police...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Ponnuswami Goundan and anr.
Chennai
In Re: Ponnuswami Goundan and anr.
Oct-08-1931
Criminal
137Ind.Cas.317; (1932)62MLJ469
1. The petitioners are two out of five persons who have been charge-sheeted by the Police before the Sub-Magistrate of Perundurai for offences under Sections 419 and 467, Indian Penal Code and Section 82 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Ponnuswami thevar and anr.
Chennai
In Re: Ponnuswami thevar and anr.
Dec-02-1921
Criminal
(1922)42MLJ139
ORDER1. The complainant came before the Sub-Divisional 1st Class Magistrate, Usilambatti, with a complaint, alleging that the 2nd accused, one member of the Village Panchayat Court lately established in his village under Act II of 1920,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Ponnuswami Reddiar and anr.
Chennai
In Re: Ponnuswami Reddiar and anr.
Jul-26-1940
civil
AIR1941Mad604
ORDERLakshmana Rao, J.1. The appeal was presented on 2nd July 1940, and the should not have been disposed of the same day in spite of the request of the advocate for time to obtain the necessary...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Ponnuswami
Chennai
In Re: Ponnuswami
Oct-19-1949
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304 and 304A
AIR1950Mad308
ORDERPanchapakesa Ayyar, J.1. This is a petition to interfere in revision with the conviction ,of. the petitioner under Section 304A, Penal Code and the sentence of six months simple imprisonment awarded on him.2. The facts are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Ponnuswami and anr.
Chennai
In Re: Ponnuswami and anr.
Mar-31-1950
Criminal
Hindu Law; Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act, 1949 - Sections 4(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 439
AIR1950Mad777; (1950)IIMLJ200
ORDERChandra Reddi, J.1. In this case the two petitioners have been convicted of an offence under Section 4(2), Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act, VII (7) of 1949 and sentenced to imprisonment till the rising...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Ponnuswami Servai
Chennai
In Re: Ponnuswami Servai
Oct-28-1937
Criminal
AIR1938Mad315
ORDERLakshmana Rao, J.The offence Under Section 409, I.P.C. is not triable by the Magistrate of the Second Class and the alteration of the conviction to one Under Section 409 read with Section 109, I.P.C. is illegal....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Ponnuswamy Pillai
Chennai
In Re: Ponnuswamy Pillai
Oct-27-1939
Criminal
AIR1940Mad945
ORDERLakshmana Rao, J.1. The prosecution of the petitioner was sanctioned by the Joint Magistrate and the appeal should not have been heard by the Joint Magistrate except with the permission of the Court to which an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: M.S. Ponnuswamy Aiyar
Chennai
In Re: M.S. Ponnuswamy Aiyar
Feb-16-1938
Civil
AIR1938Mad535; (1938)1MLJ485
ORDERBurn, J.1. The learned Joint Magistrate's decision is in my opinion correct. He has quite properly declined to attempt a complete definition of the term 'cart-stand' as used in Section 270-E of the District Municipalities Act....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Peria Ponnuswami Goundan and anr.
Chennai
In Re: Peria Ponnuswami Goundan and anr.
Oct-24-1926
Criminal
AIR1927Mad506
ORDERJackson, J.1. It is argued that restraining a horse on which a person is riding is not wrongful as defined by S. 339, I. P. C. If the moment of restraint the person is pervented from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »