Advanced Search Results
In Re: S. Venkatachari, an Advocate of the High Court
Chennai
In Re: S. Venkatachari, an Advocate of the High Court
Mar-10-1931
Civil
AIR1932Mad131
Waller, J.1. The facts have been set out at length in the finding of the tribunal and it is not necessary for me to recapitulate them. Briefly, the questions for decision are whether:(1) The two payments...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Sri Sitaram Chaprala, Advocate, High Court of A.P.
Andhra Pradesh
In Re: Sri Sitaram Chaprala, Advocate, High Court of A.P.
Dec-31-2009
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 14 and 14(2); Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act
2010(1)ALT548
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The proceedings in this case are initiated by this Court, suo motu, under Section 14 of the Contempt of Courts Act, (for short 'the Act'). The facts that gave rise to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Matter of and Advocate of Benares
Allahabad
In Re: Matter of and Advocate of Benares
May-26-1932
Civil
AIR1932All492
Young, J.1. Complaint having been made by one Suraj Prasad Dube on 26th November 1929 against Mr. B., an advocate enrolled in this Court, this Court under the Bar Council Act, Section 10, referred the matter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate
Supreme Court of India
In Re: Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate
Sep-25-1998
Contempt of CourtCriminal
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 5 and 12; Constitution of India; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 499, 500 and 504
AIR1998SC3299; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)674; 1998CriLJ4606; (1997)2GLR523; JT1998(6)SC571; RLW1999(1)SC142; 1998(5)SCALE393; (1998)7SCC248; [1998]Supp2SCR87
A.S. Anand, J.1. The alleged contender-Ajay Kumar Pandey, a practising advocate, filed a criminal complaint against an Advocate Mr. Mahesh Giri and an Additional District Judge, Ms. Saroj Bala, then posted as VII Additional District Judge,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Provash Chandra Mallick, Advocate
Kolkata
In Re: Provash Chandra Mallick, Advocate
Mar-17-1961
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Section 1; ;Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Section 10
AIR1961Cal495,1961CriLJ334
G.K. Mitter, J. 1. This matter arises out of a reference made by this Court for inquiry under Section 10(2) of the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926. In consultation with the Bar Council the reference was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: N.K. Sen, Advocate
Kolkata
In Re: N.K. Sen, Advocate
Dec-13-1951
Civil
Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Section 10(1)
AIR1952Cal551
Chakravartti, J.1. This is a proceeding under Section 10 of the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 against a certain Advocate.2. The Advocate concerned is one Mr. N. K. Sen, who was enrolled on January 2, 1948...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Sri Kirti Ram Advocate
Himachal Pradesh
In Re: Sri Kirti Ram Advocate
Aug-13-1953
Civil
Stampt Act, 1899 - Sections 2(6) and 3 - Schedule - Article 30; ;Stamp (Himachal Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1953
AIR1954HP51
ORDERChowdhry, J.C.1. The petitioner, Sri Kirti Ram Tewari, applied to be admitted and enrolled as an Advocate of this Court and prayed for exemption from payment of the stamp duty under Article 30, Schedule I, Stamp...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Sri A. Gurubasappa, Advocate Rayadrug
Andhra Pradesh
In Re: Sri A. Gurubasappa, Advocate Rayadrug
Aug-12-1963
Civil
Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 10 to 13; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 50, 50(4), 56 and 56(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3, Rule 4
AIR1964AP261
Satyanarayana Raju, J. 1. This proceeding arises out of a complaint preferred by one M. Basappa (hereinafter referred to as the complainant) to the High Court alleging professional misconduct against Sri A. Gurubasappa (hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Shitla Prasad Mishra, Advocate and 22 ors.
Allahabad
In Re: Shitla Prasad Mishra, Advocate and 22 ors.
Jan-17-2003
CriminalContempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 10 and 12
(2003)1UPLBEC726
M. Katju, Sudhir Narain and S. Rafat Alam, JJ.1. This Full Bench of three Judges has been constituted by the s of Hon'ble theing Chief Justice dated 13.1.2003. The matter relates to contempt of Court proceedings...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: V.G. Tamaskar, Advocate
Chhattisgarh
In Re: V.G. Tamaskar, Advocate
Dec-14-2001
Civil
Limitation Act - Sections 5 and 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 148A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 439
2001(5)MPHT58(CG)
ORDER1. The matter relates to conduct of an advocate regarding submission while making special request for listing a case urgently.2. Shri Tamaskar, in the court slip has mentioned in red ink as under:'If the Court slip...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »