Advanced Search Results
In Re: Mr. K.M., First Grade Pleader, Chalapuram; in Re: Mr. U.G. Firs ...
Chennai
In Re: Mr. K.M., First Grade Pleader, Chalapuram; in Re: Mr. U.G. First Grade Pleader, Kallai
Jul-31-1923
Service Tax
92Ind.Cas.214
Walter Salis Schwabe, C.J.1. I think these cases have been very properly brought before the Court, so that the two Pleaders, Mr. K.M. and Mr. U.G. may have the opportunity of explaining to the Court the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Mr. K.M., First Grade Pleader
Chennai
In Re: Mr. K.M., First Grade Pleader;In Re: Mr. U.G., First Grade Pleader
Jul-31-1923
Service Tax
AIR1924Mad479
Schwabe, C.J.1. I think these oases have been very properly brought before the Court, so that the two pleaders, Mr. K.M. and Mr. U.G. may have the opportunity of explaining to the Court the circumstances relating...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: a Pleader
Kolkata
In Re: a Pleader
Mar-28-1929
Criminal
AIR1930Cal513
Jack, J.1. By this rule under Section 12, Legal Practitioners Act, S pleader, has been directed to show cause why he should not be suspended or dismissed, on the ground that he has been convicted of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: a Pleader
Chennai
In Re: a Pleader
Jul-21-1947
civil
AIR1948Mad62
Gentle, C.J.1. This is an application by the petitioner, who formerly was a pleader, for restoration of his sanad and reinstatement as pleader. He was first enrolled as a First Grade Pleader in 1925. Upon complaint...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: a Pleader
Chennai
In Re: a Pleader
Dec-15-1947
Civil
AIR1948Mad273; (1948)1MLJ170
Frederick William Gentle, C.J.1. This case comes before the Court under Section 15 of the Legal Practitioners Act upon the finding expressed by the learned District Judge of Madura after holding an inquiry into a complaint...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: a Pleader
Chennai
In Re: a Pleader
Apr-12-1943
Civil
(1943)2MLJ126
Alfred Henry Lionel Leach, C.J.1. The respondent is a pleader who practised at Gudiwada in the Kistna District. He was convicted under Rule 38(5) of the Defence of India Rules for having violated Rule 38(1)(a) and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Two Pleaders
Kolkata
In Re: Two Pleaders
Jul-20-1933
Criminal
AIR1933Cal731
1. In this case a rule was issued by this Court on two pleaders practising in the District Judge's Court at Sylhet, to show cause why they should not be suspended or dismissed on the ground...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: a Pleader
Allahabad
In Re: a Pleader
Jan-04-1916
Civil
AIR1916All312; (1916)ILR38All182; 33Ind.Cas.632
Henry Richards, C.J., Tudball and Muhammad Rafiq, JJ.1. This is an application by a pleader whose certificate the learned District Judge of Meerut refused to renew in December last. It appears that the gentleman in question...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: a Pleader
Chennai
In Re: a Pleader
Jan-17-1944
civil
AIR1944Mad244
Leach, C.J.1. The respondent is a pleader practising at Palni. Rule. 11 of the rules framed under the Legal Practitioners' Act requires that an application for renewal of a certificate must be made through the Judge...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: a Pleader
Chennai
In Re: a Pleader
Jan-31-1944
criminal
AIR1944Mad268
Leach, C.J.1. The respondent is a pleader practising at Vellore. Five charges of professional misconduct were framed against him; and later three additional charges. These have been investigated by the Subordinate Judge of Vellore with whose...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »