Advanced Search Results
In Re: Mr. K.M., First Grade Pleader, Chalapuram; in Re: Mr. U.G. Firs ...
Chennai
In Re: Mr. K.M., First Grade Pleader, Chalapuram; in Re: Mr. U.G. First Grade Pleader, Kallai
Jul-31-1923
Service Tax
92Ind.Cas.214
Walter Salis Schwabe, C.J.1. I think these cases have been very properly brought before the Court, so that the two Pleaders, Mr. K.M. and Mr. U.G. may have the opportunity of explaining to the Court the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Mr. K.M., First Grade Pleader
Chennai
In Re: Mr. K.M., First Grade Pleader;In Re: Mr. U.G., First Grade Pleader
Jul-31-1923
Service Tax
AIR1924Mad479
Schwabe, C.J.1. I think these oases have been very properly brought before the Court, so that the two pleaders, Mr. K.M. and Mr. U.G. may have the opportunity of explaining to the Court the circumstances relating...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Second Grade Pleaders
Chennai
In Re: Second Grade Pleaders
Apr-19-1910
Civil
(1910)20MLJ500
ORDERArnold White, C.J.1. In these proceedings two Second Grade Pleaders have been called upon to show cause why they should not be suspended or dismissed by reason of their conduct in having joined the Board of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: R., a Pleader
Allahabad
In Re: R., a Pleader
Nov-04-1932
Civil
AIR1933All224; 145Ind.Cas.847
King, J.1. Mr. R., a pleader, has appeared before us in response to a notice issued by a Bench of this Court to show cause who he should not be suspended or dismissed as a pleader...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: S, a Pleader
Kolkata
In Re: S, a Pleader
Mar-28-1929
Criminal
AIR1929Cal771
Jack, J.1. By this rule under Section 12, Legal Practitioners' Act, S, a Pleader, has been directed to show cause why he should not be suspended or dismissed on the ground that he has been convicted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: P, a Pleader
Kolkata
In Re: P, a Pleader
Mar-18-1936
Civil
AIR1936Cal372
ORDER1. This is a rule upon Babu Probhat Chandra Bhattacharya, a pleader of Rangpur to show cause why he should not be suspended or dismissed under Section 13 (f), Legal Practitioners Act. The facts on which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: P.A. Pleader
Kolkata
In Re: P.A. Pleader
Mar-18-1936
Education
166Ind.Cas.426
ORDER1. This is a Rule upon Babu Probhat Chandra Bhattacharya, a Pleader of Rangpur to show cause why he should not be suspended or dismissed tinder Section 13(f), Legal Practitioners Act. The facts on which the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: N., a Pleader
Kolkata
In Re: N., a Pleader
Aug-19-1935
Criminal
AIR1935Cal742,159Ind.Cas.664
ORDER1. The rule in this case was issued by the full Court under Section 12, Legal Practitioners Act (18 of 1879), calling upon N, a pleader practising at Sylhet, to show cause why he should not...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Mr. H. Pleader
Kolkata
In Re: Mr. H. Pleader
Nov-24-1932
Civil
AIR1933Cal344
Costello, J.1. This matter comes before us on a reference by the District Judge of Jalpaiguri, under Section. 14, of the Legal Practitioners Act of 1879. It appears that H who is a pleader practising at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: A, a Pleader
Kolkata
In Re: A, a Pleader
Dec-11-1933
Civil
AIR1934Cal242a
Lort-Williams, J.1. In this case, a Rule was issued by virtue of the powers vested in the Court under 8. 12, Legal Practitioners Act (18 of 1879), calling upon A, a pleader, to show cause why...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »