Advanced Search Results
In Re: B.K. Paul and Co.
Kolkata
In Re: B.K. Paul and Co.
Feb-24-1938
Direct Taxation
AIR1939Cal196
Derbyshire, C.J.1. The assessees, Messrs. B.K. Paul & Co., are an undivided Hindu family. Prior to 14th April 1934 the assessees owned real property, Government securities, shares in private companies and some 17 businesses which either...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Krishna Kishore Paul
Kolkata
In Re: Krishna Kishore Paul
Jan-28-1931
Civil
AIR1931Cal775
Pankckridge, J.1. This is an application on behalf of a creditor whose debt amounts to Rs. 11,761-8-3 to adjudicate Krishna Kishore Paul an insolvent.2. This only difficulty in the matter is occasioned by the fact that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re : Balai Chand Paul and ors.
Kolkata
In Re : Balai Chand Paul and ors.
May-17-1991
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Order 22, Rule 3
(1991)2CALLT172(HC),96CWN133
Samir Kumar Mookherjee, J.1. The predecessor-in-interest of the present opposite parties instituted a suit, inter alia, for a declaration that he is/was a partner with the present revisional petitioners in a firm, known as M/s. Balai...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Sankar Das Paul and ors.
Kolkata
In Re: Sankar Das Paul and ors.
Sep-22-1989
ConstitutionElection
Bengal Municipal Act, 1932 - Section 553; ;Bengal Municipal (Amendment) Act, 1980; ;Constitution of India - Article 14
(1989)2CALLT379(HC),94CWN233
Monoranjan Mallick, J.1. The petitioners are the Commissioners of Berhampore Municipality in the district of Murshidabad and they are 19 in number belonging to Congress (I). The total number of seats of Commissioners of Berhampore Municipality...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: A.A. Paul
Chennai
In Re: A.A. Paul
Jul-27-1973
Criminal
1974CriLJ375
ORDERN.S. Ramaswami, J.1. The revision is against the order of the Special Judge, Madras, dismissing a petition purporting to be one under Section 251-A of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 126 of the Army Act....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB. K. Paul and Co., in Re.
Kolkata
B. K. Paul and Co., in Re.
Feb-24-1938
Direct Taxation
[1938]6ITR395(Cal)
DERBYSHIRE, C.J. - The assessees, Messrs, B. K. Paul and Company, are an undivided Hindu family. Prior to April 14, 1934, the assessee owned real property, Government securities, shares in private companies and some 17 businesses...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re St Paul Fire and Marine Ins Co
US Supreme Court
In Re St Paul Fire and Marine Ins Co
Jan-01-1890
MRTP
IN RE ST PAUL FIRE & MARINE INS CO - 134 U.S. 493 (1890) U.S. Supreme Court IN RE ST PAUL FIRE & MARINE INS CO, 134 U.S. 493 (1890) 134 U.S. 493 In re ST....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Arthur Paul Benthall
Kolkata
In Re: Arthur Paul Benthall
Jun-27-1952
Civil
Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 5, 6 and 31 - Schedule - Article 48
AIR1952Cal815,57CWN323
Chakravartti, C.J.1. This is a Reference under Section 57, Stamp Act and came to be made in the following circumstances.2. On 4-7-1949, Messrs. Orr, Dignam & Co., writing as Solicitors for the Bengal Chamber of Commerce,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Bejoy Paul
Kolkata
In Re: Bejoy Paul
Jan-08-1996
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A
(1996)1CALLT59(HC)
Samir Kumar Mookherjee, J.1. This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In view of the emphatic submissions made by the learned Public Prosecutor to the effect that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Alfred Paul
Chennai
In Re: Alfred Paul
Sep-28-1943
Criminal
AIR1944Mad166; (1943)2MLJ597
ORDERHorwill, J.1. This revision petition is against the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Coimbatore confirming the conviction of the petitioner under Section 353, Indian Penal Code and reducing the fine from Rs. 100 to Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›