Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: harris · Respondent: commissioner · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.013 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 04 1995

Monte Harris Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Appellant : Monte Harris

Respondent : Commissioner of Income-tax

Decided on : Aug-04-1995

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)218ITR413AAR

1. The questions raised in this application under Section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called "the Act"), are capable of easy answer. However, a couple of objections to the maintainability of the application have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 1950

Harris Vs. Commissioner

Court : US Supreme Court

Appellant : Harris

Respondent : Commissioner

Decided on : Nov-27-1950

Subject : MRTP

Harris v. Commissioner - 340 U.S. 106 (1950) U.S. Supreme Court Harris v. Commissioner, 340 U.S. 106 (1950) Harris v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue No. 14 Argued October 16, 1950 Decided November 27, 1950 340 U.S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2001

Frederic R. Harris (India) (P.) Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Appellant : Frederic R. Harris (India) (P.)

Respondent : Deputy Commissioner of

Decided on : Aug-23-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)81ITD227(Delhi)

1. The only issue arising out of this appeal relates to the disallowance of Rs. 83,58,500 being the amount of provisions for expenses.2. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are these. The assessee is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 17 2005

MartIn and Harris Laboratories Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Appellant : MartIn and Harris Laboratories

Respondent : Commissioner of C. Ex.

Decided on : Mar-17-2005

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2005)(185)ELT421TriDel

1. In this appeal, challenge has been made by the appellants to the impugned order-in-original dated 25-10-2004 vide which the adjudicating authority (Commissioner of Central Excise) has confirmed the duty demand with penalty, as detailed therein,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial