Advanced Search Results

Haresh Mahadeo Kamble and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Haresh Mahadeo Kamble and Etc. Etc.

Respondent : State of Maharashtra

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 154, 323 and 376(2)

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1297

D.G. Deshpande, J.1. In all seven accused faced prosecution before the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for the offence of gang rape in Sessions Case No. 223 of 1994. Out of them, accused No. 7 Ganesh Babu...

State of Maharashtra Vs. Haresh Mohandas Rajput

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : State of Maharashtra;haresh Mohandas Rajput

Respondent : Haresh Mohandas Rajput;state of Maharashtra

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR373

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By filing the above Appeal No.1020 of 2001 the Appellant-State is seeking the enhancement of sentence awarded to the Respondent-original accused by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. Whereas, by filing the Appeal No....

Haresh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Haresh

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 07.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1279/2018 HARESH STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner...

Haresh and ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Appellant : Haresh and ors.

Respondent : State of Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009CriLJ1383; 2009(3)MPHT13(CG)

ORDERT.P. Sharma, J.1. This revision is directed against the order dated 1-3-2004 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhamtari in Sessions Trial No. 396/2003, whereby learned Additional Sessions Judge has framed charge for offence punishable under...

Haresh Dayaram Thakur Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Haresh Dayaram Thakur

Respondent : State of Maharashtra and Others

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 30 and 61 to 81; CPC; Evidence Act, 1872; Maharashtra Housing and Development Act, 1966 - Sections 66(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2000SC2281; JT2000(6)SC349; 2000(4)SCALE451; (2000)6SCC179

ORDERD.P. Mohapatra, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant Haresh Dayaram Thakur and respondent No. 3 Pitambar Dayaram Thakur are brothers. Raj Kumari Petambar Thakur Respondent No. 4 is wife of respondent No. 3. The dispute raised in the...

Haresh Chandra Yadav Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Appellant : Haresh Chandra Yadav

Respondent : The State of Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 W.P.No.926/2010 Haresh Chandra Yadav versus State of M.P.& ORS.30.08.2012 Shri Atul Chaudhary learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri R.P.Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate, for the respondent/State. Heard. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by...

Haresh Kumar Pathak Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Appellant : Haresh Kumar Pathak

Respondent : The State of Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

1 1 Writ Appeal No.850/2012 08.08.2012 Shri Praveen Verma, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Vijay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General for the re- spondents. This appeal is directed against an order dated 19.6.2012 by which the Single...

Haresh Kedare and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Haresh Kedare and Others

Respondent : State of Maharashtra and Others

Subject : Education

P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the University and the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Management. 2. By this Petition which...

Haresh A Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and Another

Court : Gujarat

Appellant : Haresh A Patel

Respondent : State of Gujarat and Another

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: 1. The question, namely, what is cheating and breach of trust that is raised most often in the Courts, is once again raised in the present case. In a sense, context in the present...

Rashmi Haresh Tawari Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, ...

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Rashmi Haresh Tawari

Respondent : State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Social Welfare Department and Others

Subject : Right to Information

Oral Judgment: (Anoop V. Mohta, J.) 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2. On 20 September 1997, the Petitioner was appointed by Respondent No.2 and posted at the office of Respondent No.3...