Advanced Search Results
Harbilas Rai Bansal Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Harbilas Rai Bansal
State of Punjab and anr.
Dec-02-1996
PropertyCivil
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19
(1997)115PLR536
V.S. Aggarwal, J.1. Petitioner (Harbilas Rai Bansal) is owner and landlord of a shop situated in Mandi Giddarbaha, Ward No. 4, Old Subzi Mandi. Respondent No. 2 Avtar Krishan Arora is a tenant in the said...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarbilas Rai Bansal Vs. State of Punjab and Another
Supreme Court of India
Harbilas Rai Bansal
State of Punjab and Another
Dec-05-1995
ConstitutionTenancy
Constitution of India - Articles 6, 14 and 226; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 13; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Amendment) Act, 1956; Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1947; Ajmer Marwar Rent Control act, 1947; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 93
AIR1996SC857; JT1995(8)SC458; (1996)112PLR227; 1995(6)SCALE717; (1996)1SCC1; [1995]Supp6SCR178; 1996(1)LC464(SC)
ORDERKuldip Singh, J.1. The East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (the Act)-prior to 1956-permitted a landlord to evict his tenant from a non-residential building on the ground of bona fide requirement for his own use,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarbilas Vs. the State
Madhya Pradesh
Harbilas
The State
Aug-13-1951
Criminal
1952CriLJ142
ORDERDixit, J.1. This is an application in revision against the order of the District Magistrate of Morena, confirming an order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Joura, directing the recovery of money forfeited by the petitioner who stood...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›