Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: harbilas · Respondent: the state · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.012 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 02 1996

Harbilas Rai Bansal Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Harbilas Rai Bansal

Respondent : State of Punjab and anr.

Decided on : Dec-02-1996

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : (1997)115PLR536

V.S. Aggarwal, J.1. Petitioner (Harbilas Rai Bansal) is owner and landlord of a shop situated in Mandi Giddarbaha, Ward No. 4, Old Subzi Mandi. Respondent No. 2 Avtar Krishan Arora is a tenant in the said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1995

Harbilas Rai Bansal Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Harbilas Rai Bansal

Respondent : State of Punjab and Another

Decided on : Dec-05-1995

Subject : ConstitutionTenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 6, 14 and 226; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 13; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Amendment) Act, 1956; Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1947; Ajmer Marwar Rent Control act, 1947; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 93

Reported in : AIR1996SC857; JT1995(8)SC458; (1996)112PLR227; 1995(6)SCALE717; (1996)1SCC1; [1995]Supp6SCR178; 1996(1)LC464(SC)

ORDERKuldip Singh, J.1. The East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (the Act)-prior to 1956-permitted a landlord to evict his tenant from a non-residential building on the ground of bona fide requirement for his own use,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1951

Harbilas Vs. the State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Appellant : Harbilas

Respondent : The State

Decided on : Aug-13-1951

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1952CriLJ142

ORDERDixit, J.1. This is an application in revision against the order of the District Magistrate of Morena, confirming an order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Joura, directing the recovery of money forfeited by the petitioner who stood...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial