Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: hanuman · Respondent: fattu · Page 1 of about 1 results (0.007 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Nov 29 1966

Hanuman Vs. Fattu

Court : Rajasthan

Appellant : Hanuman

Respondent : Fattu

Decided on : Nov-29-1966

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(5) and 2(22) - Schedule - Articles 13 and 49

Reported in : AIR1967Raj235

ORDERJagat Narayan, J. 1. This is a defendant's revision application against an order of the appellate court holding that the suit document is not a promissory note. The document runs as follows: 'I Hanuman son of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales