Advanced Search Results
Hamid Khan Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Hamid Khan
Emperor
Mar-28-1947
Criminal
AIR1948All59
Raghubar Dayal, J.1. Hamid Khan appeals against his conviction under Section 379/511 read with Section 75, Penal Code, and a sentence of seven years' rigorous imprisonment. The conviction of the appellant under Section 379/511, Penal Code...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Hamid and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Abdul Hamid and ors.
Emperor
Mar-28-1945
Criminal
AIR1948Cal107
ORDERHenderson, J.1. This is a Rule calling upon the District Magistrate of Mymensingh to show cause why an order calling upon the petitioners to execute bonds to be of good behaviour should not be set aside....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHamid Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
Hamid
Emperor
Mar-26-1930
Criminal
129Ind.Cas.731
Shah Mohammad Sulaiman, J.1. On a report made by this office this appeal was returned by a learned Judge of this Court for presentation to the Sessions Judge. When it was presented before him he also...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hamid Ali Haldar Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Hamid Ali Haldar
Emperor
Feb-20-1929
Criminal
AIR1930Cal320
Rankin, C.J.1. In this case when the trial had proceeded to the end of the learned Judge's charge to the jury, the jury considered their verdict. There were eleven accused and the foreman read out the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask(Syed) Hamid Hasan and ors. Vs. Emperor
Allahabad
(Syed) Hamid Hasan and ors.
Emperor
Oct-07-1931
Criminal
AIR1932All162
Niamatullah, J.1. This is an application for revision of an order of the District Magistrate of Ghazipur purporting to be one on appeal from an order of the Joint Magistrate of that district passed in proceedings,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHamid Ali Bepari Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Hamid Ali Bepari
Emperor
Jun-19-1925
Criminal
AIR1926Cal149,(1925)ILR52Cal1015
Cuming, J.1. This is a rule granted against the order of the learned Additional District Magistrate of Backergunj upholding the conviction of the appellant but reducing the sentence to a fine of Rs. 100. The rule...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›