Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: gulab · Respondent: emperor · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.019 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 09 1916

Thakur Gulab Singh Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Thakur Gulab Singh

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : May-09-1916

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 35Ind.Cas.991

Lindsay, J.1. These two appeals are connected and may be disposed of by one judgment. They have arisen out of a trial held in the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge of Bareilly in which three...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1924

Gulab Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Gulab

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Nov-25-1924

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1925All667

Daniels, J.1. This is an appeal against an order passed under Section 476-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the learned Sessions Judge of Farrukhabad, directing the prosecution of the appellant Gulab for an offence...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 1916

Gulab Rai and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Gulab Rai and anr.

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Dec-06-1916

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1917All133; 38Ind.Cas.985

George Knox, J.1. The main point urged before me is that the trial of the petitioners is not in accordance with the law, inasmuch as (1) the report of the Prosecuting Inspector asking that proceedings be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 06 1935

Gulab Singh Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Gulab Singh

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Feb-06-1935

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1935All458a; 158Ind.Cas.38

Kendall, J.1. The appellant Gulab Singh. has been convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Aligarh of offences under Sections 458 and 459 Penal Code, and sentenced to concurrent terms of three years rigorous imprisonment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 1925

Gulab Singh and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Gulab Singh and anr.

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Mar-24-1925

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1925All751

Stuart, J.1. Commitments should only be quashed when on the face of it there is something of the nature of a fatal flaw in the prosecution. In this particular case there is a fatal flaw. There...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 1909

Gulab Khan and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Gulab Khan and ors.

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Nov-18-1909

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 4Ind.Cas.312

ORDERStanley, C.J.1. This is an application to set aside an order of the Additional Sessions Judge of Aligarh, dated the 17th of August 1909, whereby he revoked the order of the Magistrate of the first class...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 1926

Gulab Singh and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Gulab Singh and anr.

Respondent : Emperor

Decided on : Aug-10-1926

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1927All112

Banerji, J.1. This is an application in revision by two men who are a Girdawar and a Sazawal, of the Agori Barhar Estate in the District of Mirzapur. The complainant Deoraj and the Barhar Estate have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 24 1916

Gulab Singh Vs. Emperor Through Municipal Board

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Gulab Singh

Respondent : Emperor Through Municipal Board

Decided on : Jun-24-1916

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1916All133; 35Ind.Cas.964

Walsh, J.1. In my opinion this order cannot stand. The charge against the accused is a charge of digging up the road, which is apparently a method of stating the way in which the accused according...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 1927

Gulab and ors. Vs. King-emperor

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Gulab and ors.

Respondent : King-emperor

Decided on : Oct-28-1927

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : AIR1928All128a

ORDERWalsh, J.1. This is an application in revision against a judgment of 13. Birendra Pratap Sahi, Deputy Magistrate, 1st Class, sentencing the accused applicants to pay fines of Rs. 25 each under Sections 353 and 225,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial