Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: glaxo smithkline · Respondent: c c e · Page 1 of about 1 results (0.085 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Jul 06 2005

Glaxo Smithkline Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Appellant : Glaxo Smithkline

Respondent : C.C.E.

Decided on : Jul-06-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(188)ELT171Tri(Mum.)bai

1. We find some typographical errors as a result of which the Order No.A-668/WZB/2004-CII, dated 20-8-2004 & Corrigendum No. M-514/WZB/05-CII, dated 9-12-2004 of this Tribunal does not make very clear reading and its meaning somewhat unclear....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales