Advanced Search Results
Fakira Vs. State
Allahabad
Fakira
State
Sep-12-2012
Criminal
Sudhir Agarwal, J. 1. Fakira and his two sons Rajvir and Sheoraj were tried in Sessions Trial No. 214 of 1980 before Sri Y.C. Raizade, IV Additional Sessions Judge, Bulandshahr for the offences under Sections 307...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFakira and Others Vs. the State of Haryana and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Fakira and Others
The State of Haryana and Others
Mar-11-2013
Education
CWP No.416 of 1986 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.416 of 1986 Date of Decision :11. 3.2013 Fakira and others ..PetitioneRs.versus The State of Haryana and others ..Respondents. CORAM :...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFakira Sahu Vs. State of Orissa
Orissa
Fakira Sahu
State of Orissa
Aug-03-1999
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 377, 378 and 394
1999(II)OLR398
A. Pasayat, Acting C.J.1. From the letter of learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Puri it appears that the appellant Fakira Sahu expired on 19.6.1999. He was convicted for commission of offence punishable Under Section 302 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Fakira Rana Vs. State of Orissa
Orissa
Fakira Rana
State of Orissa
Nov-17-2009
Criminal
2010(I)OLR75
Pradip Mohanty, J.1 This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 4.9.1999 passed by the Sessions Judge, Sundargarh in S.T. No. 3 of 1997 convicting the appellant under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentencing him...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPadmasing S/O Kondu Chanda, Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Its S ...
Mumbai
Padmasing S/O Kondu Chanda, ;nimba S/O Fakira Badgujar, ;vilas S/O Devram Mahajan and Dashrath S/O D
The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary, School Education Department and ors.
Jul-15-2008
Service
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Act, 1977; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rule 9(10) and 10
(2008)110BOMLR2392
F.I. Rebello, J.1. Rule. Heard forthwith by consent of the parties.2. Petitioners have approached this Court to challenge the appointment of respondent No. 6 to the post of Head Master in respondent No. 5 - school....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatish Fakira Dhangar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Satish Fakira Dhangar and ors.
State of Maharashtra
Jan-30-2009
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 113A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 107, 304B, 306 and 498A
2009CriLJ3216
V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. Challenge in this Appeal is to Judgment rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Sessions Case No. 150 of 1994 whereby Appellants were convicted for offences punishable under Section 498A and 306...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRati Ram So. Late Fakira, R.O. Gandhi Gram New Bast Vs. the State
Uttaranchal
Rati Ram So. Late Fakira, R.O. Gandhi Gram New Bast
The State
Sep-06-2010
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 446, 449; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 397, 395
1. This appeal, preferred u/s 449 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.], is directed against the order dated 20.11.1999 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dehradun in Criminal Misc....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Hari Fakira Kale, Vs. the State of Maharashtra,
Mumbai
Shri Hari Fakira Kale, ;narayan Dhanaji Kale, ;shri Ashok Dhanaji Kale, ;shri Satish Dhanaji Kale, ;
The State of Maharashtra, ;The Special Land Acquisition Officer No. 2 of Nasik, ;The Collector of Na
Feb-20-2003
Property
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 4(1), 9, 28, 31, 37, 126(2), 126(4) and 127; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 5A, 6, 9, 9(1)(2), 9(3)(4), 11A, 16, 17 and 18(1); Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984
2003(2)ALLMR439; 2003(4)BomCR538; 2003(2)MhLj593
R.M. Lodha, J.1. In this writ petition we are concerned with theacquisition of land bearing survey No. 809/2 situatedwithin the limits of Nasik Municipal Corporation. Thisland along with other adjacent lands was designated in theDevelopment Plan...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFakira Ramdas Chaudhary Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Fakira Ramdas Chaudhary
State of Maharashtra
Jan-13-1994
Criminal
1994CriLJ1805
Ashok Agarwal, J.1. This is an application for bail pending the hearing and final disposal of an appeal filed by the State seeking to impugn an order of acquittal passed for offences punishable under Ss. 21...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLotan Fakira Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Lotan Fakira Patil
State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mar-15-2001
Property
Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 21, 45 and 45(2)
2002(1)ALLMR585; 2002(1)MhLj255
1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Perused the records.2. The petitioner challenges the order dated 10th November, 1984 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nasik Division, Nasik in Ceiling Revision Case No. 137/82. Pursuant to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »