Advanced Search Results
Emperor Vs. Rustam
Allahabad
Emperor
Rustam
Aug-03-1915
Criminal
(1916)ILR39All29
Muhammad Rafiq, J.1. The appellant in this case is one Rustam, who was committed to the Court of Session on the charge of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. During his trial the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Rustam and Randhir Singh
Mumbai
Emperor
Rustam and Randhir Singh
Nov-13-1923
Civil
(1924)26BOMLR692
L.C. Dunedin, J.1. Mr. Dunne, I should like to say this, if the President does not object to ray saying it. I have now, since I have been here a good long time, sat in a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Rustam Cursetji Lam
Mumbai
Emperor
Rustam Cursetji Lam
Nov-03-1931
Criminal
(1932)34BOMLR267; 136Ind.Cas.868
John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. These are two applications in revision against two convictions passed by the Presidency Magistrate, fourth Court. In application No. 243 Dr. Lam was charged with keeping a common gaming house and thereby...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Emperor Vs. Rustam Karanjia
Mumbai
Emperor
Rustam Karanjia
Aug-10-1945
Civil
AIR1946Bom115; (1945)47BOMLR986
Divatia, J.1. This is an appeal by Government against the order of the Chief Presidency Magistrate of Bombay acquitting the editor and publisher of a weekly newspaper in Bombay called 'Blitz' of the offence under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›