Advanced Search Results
Emperor Vs. Mathura
Allahabad
Emperor
Mathura
Oct-04-1933
Criminal
AIR1934All43; 147Ind.Cas.653
ORDERIqbal Ahmad, J.1. The learned Second Additional Sessions Judge of Cawnpore has made this reference by a letter dated 6th September 1933, asking this Court to sanction the prosecution of Mathura under Section 339(3), Criminal P.C....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Mathura Prasad
Allahabad
Emperor
Mathura Prasad
Jul-25-1917
Criminal
(1917)ILR39All715
Walsh, J.1. In this case the question is whether the accused made a false charge under Section 211. What amounts to a 'charge' must in the absence of a definition in the Code itself depend largely...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Mathura and ors.
Allahabad
Emperor
Mathura and ors.
Aug-03-1918
Criminal
AIR1916All179; (1919)ILR61All116
Piggott, J.1. In this case the three applicants, Mathura, Ganga Din and Jagannath, have been convicted of an offence under Section 13 of the Gambling Act, No. III of 1867. The one and only question raised...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Emperor Vs. Mathura Prasad
Kolkata
Emperor
Mathura Prasad
Feb-06-1902
Criminal
Prinsep and Stephen, JJ.1. The object of the reference seems doubtful. The Subdivisional Magistrate, who is also Chairman of the Municipality, has in one order convicted the accused under Section 273 (1) of the Bengal Municipal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›