Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: emperor · Respondent: hari · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.013 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 11 1918

Emperor Vs. Hari Ramji Pavar

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Hari Ramji Pavar

Decided on : Jan-11-1918

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1918)20BOMLR365

Shah, J.1. In this case the accused was charged with Committing the murder of a boy named Vishwas on the 13th of August last, the murder having been caused by drowning the boy in a river....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1922

Emperor Vs. Hari Das Mitra and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Hari Das Mitra and anr.

Decided on : Jul-05-1922

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1923Cal108,73Ind.Cas.770

Walmsley, J.1. This case has been referred under Section 307, Criminal Procedure Code, by the Sessions Judge of Khulna.2. The story told by the prosecution is as follows:--Two young. Brahmin women Jibantara, the wife of Khetra...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1924

Emperor Vs. Motiram Hari

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Motiram Hari

Decided on : Sep-15-1924

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1924)26BOMLR1223

Fawcett, J.1. [His lordship in dealing with the objection as to the admissibility of Ex. 360 observed:] As to (1), objection was taken to Exh. 360, which is a certified copy of the judgment of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 29 1926

Emperor Vs. Garib Hari

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Garib Hari

Decided on : Jan-29-1926

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1926Cal742,94Ind.Cas.365

1. This is a Reference by the Second Additional Sessions Judge of Burdwan under the provisions of Section 307, Cr. P.C. The accused Garib Hari was tried for an offence under Section 304, Indian Penal Code,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1907

Emperor Vs. Rawji Hari Yelgaumkar

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Rawji Hari Yelgaumkar

Decided on : Jan-16-1907

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1907)9BOMLR225

Batty, J.1. The question whether the District Magistrate's order directing the commitment of this case to the Sessions should be set aside depends mainly upon the construction that is to be placed on the words of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 1931

Emperor Vs. Hari Moreshvar Joshi

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Hari Moreshvar Joshi

Decided on : Aug-10-1931

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1931)33BOMLR1515

John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. In this case the petitioner is about to be charged under Section 124 A of the Indian Penal Code, the nature of the offence being that he made a speech in which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 1943

Emperor Vs. Trimbak Hari Tulpule

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Trimbak Hari Tulpule

Decided on : Jul-01-1943

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1943)45BOMLR893

John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. This is an application of a somewhat unusual character, and, in my opinion, it is entirely misconceived. The applicant is an under-trial prisoner, who is in custody in the Yeravada Jail, and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1915

Emperor Vs. Hari Bijal

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Hari Bijal

Decided on : Sep-09-1915

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1915)17BOMLR906

Batchelor, J.1. This is a reference made by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Ahmedabad in a case in which the two accused, Hari Bijal and Ganda Hari, were charged inter alia with the murder of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 1932

Emperor Vs. Balkrishna Hari Phansalkar

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Balkrishna Hari Phansalkar

Decided on : Jul-20-1932

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1932)34BOMLR1523

John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. In this case we have already held that we possess powers of superintendence. But the exercise of a power of superintendence is not the same thing as the hearing of an appeal....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 1935

Emperor Vs. Hari

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Hari

Decided on : Apr-12-1935

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1935)37BOMLR634

Atkin, J.1. This is an appeal in a criminal case which has undergone ;some vicissitudes in the Courts in India.2. The appellant, with six other persons, was tried at Karachi and was convicted of murder. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial