Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: emperor · Respondent: d · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.013 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 15 1930

Emperor Vs. D.R. Guru

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : D.R. Guru

Decided on : Apr-15-1930

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1930)32BOMLR1131

Mirza, J.1. The applicant along with four others is being prosecutad before the City Magistrate, First Class, Poona, for offences punishable under Sections 406, 120B, and 163 of the Indian Penal Code. On March 24, 1930,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1931

Emperor Vs. P.X. D'souza

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : P.X. D'souza

Decided on : Nov-26-1931

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1932)34BOMLR286

John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. This is an application in revision against a conviction of the accused by the Presidency Magistrate Third Court, for an offence under Section 4(a) of the Bombay Prevention ofGambling Act. The accused...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 15 1935

Emperor Vs. Mrs. S. D'Cunha

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Mrs. S. D'Cunha

Decided on : Aug-15-1935

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1936Bom15; (1935)37BOMLR880; 160Ind.Cas.515

John Beaumont, Kt., C.J.1. This is an application in revision against an order made; by the Cantonment Magistrate, First Class, Kirkee, convicting the accused of criminal trespass under Section 448, Indian Penal Code, and directing possession...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 12 1948

Emperor Vs. Peter D'souza

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Peter D'souza

Decided on : Apr-12-1948

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1948)50BOMLR574

M.C. Chagla, C.J.1. The case referred to us to this full bench raises a very short question of construction of Section 43 of the Abkari Act. Section 43 of the Act before it was amended contained...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 1946

Emperor Vs. Joseph D'silva

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Joseph D'silva

Decided on : Feb-14-1946

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1947Bom310; (1947)49BOMLR6

Leonard Stone, Kt., C.J.1. This is an application in revision from the decision of Mr. Ahmed I. Rahimtoola, Presidency Magistrate of the Sixth Additional Court, Mazagaon, Bombay, who convicted the applicant under Sections 32 and 34...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1921

Emperor Vs. J.D. Sherston Baker

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : J.D. Sherston Baker

Decided on : Nov-02-1921

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : (1922)24BOMLR50

Norman Macleod, Kt., C.J.1. The applicant in this case was charged with having caused his motor oar to be driven along the Queen's Road on the 27th May 1921, without having re-registered the same for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 1944

Emperor Vs. Jerry D'Sena

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Jerry D'Sena

Decided on : Jun-22-1944

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1944)46BOMLR597

Sen, J.1. This is an application by the Government of Bombay for revision of an order passed by the Presidency Magistrate, 7th Court, Bombay, discharging the opponent, Private Jerry D'Sena, No. 3034, accused of theft and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 1946

Emperor Vs. J.C. D'Souza

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : J.C. D'Souza

Decided on : Jun-27-1946

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1947Bom151; (1946)48BOMLR754

Leonard Stone, Kt., C.J.1. This is an appeal by Government against the order of acquittal made by Mr. T. S. Vyas and dated June 20> 1945. The charge with which the accused was brought before the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1936

Emperor Vs. Don Fillius D'Silva

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Don Fillius D'Silva

Decided on : Oct-07-1936

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1937Bom165; (1937)39BOMLR77

Broomfield, J.1. The question in this case is as to the legality of a conviction under Section 193 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, XVIII of 1925, for failure to comply with a notice issued under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 1906

The King Emperor Vs. D. Samuel and ors.

Court : Chennai

Appellant : The King Emperor

Respondent : D. Samuel and ors.

Decided on : Sep-20-1906

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1906)16MLJ530

1. This is an appeal against the judgment of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Melur acquitting the accused and reversing the judgment of the 2nd Class Magistrate of Madura Town who had convicted the accused under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial