Advanced Search Results
Devesh Kumar vs.state
Delhi
Devesh Kumar
State
Dec-21-2018
Land Acquisition
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h December, 2018 Decided on:21. t December , 2018 BAIL APPLN. 2760/2018 DEVESH KUMAR Represented by: Mr. R.K. Wadhwa, Mr.Vishesh Wadhwa, Ms....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevesh Kumar Payasi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Chhattisgarh
Devesh Kumar Payasi
State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Nov-21-2012
Education
HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S NO 245.OF 201.& WRIT PETITION S NO 227.OF 201.& WRIT PETITION S NO 228.OF 201.& WRIT PETITION S NO 2 & WRIT PETITION S NO 234.OF 201.& WRIT...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevesh Kumar Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Patna
Devesh Kumar Singh
State of Bihar and ors.
Sep-01-2000
Labour and Industrial
Bihar Co-operative Societies Rules - Rule 33
Radha Mohan Prasad, J. 1. In this writ petition, petitioner prays for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents to give him the benefit of continuity and seniority in service with consequential...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Devesh Kumar Saxena Son of Ram Bahadur Saxena Vs. State of U.P. Throug ...
Allahabad
Devesh Kumar Saxena Son of Ram Bahadur Saxena
State of U.P. Through Secretary, Karmik Anubhag-2, Government of U.P., ;district Magistrate and ;add
Apr-19-2006
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1), 16(4) and 226
2006(3)AWC3019
Shishir Kumar, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant forthwith appointment to the petitioner on Group-C post in district Etawah on the basis of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevesh Kumar Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Devesh Kumar Sharma
State of U.P. and ors.
Aug-25-2003
Service
Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act, 1972 - Sections 19(1); Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Services Rules, 1981 - Rule 8 and 8(2)
(2003)3UPLBEC2794
Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard Counsel for the parties and the Standing Counsel.2. Petitioner has passed B.Ed. Examination in 1991. He submitted applications before the Secondary Education Service Commission, Azamgarh, in pursuance of the advertisement for BTC...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevesh Kumar Pathak Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Devesh Kumar Pathak
The State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Jul-05-2007
Constitution
2007(4)MPHT155
ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. In this appeal preferred under Section 2 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 the legal propriety and pregnability of the order dated 7-9-2006 passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›