Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: deepak kumar · Respondent: state · Page 1 of about 110 results (0.017 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 08 2022

Desh Deepak Kumar Vihangam@ Deepak Kumar Vs. The State Of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Desh Deepak Kumar Vihangam@ Deepak Kumar

Respondent : The State Of Bihar

Decided on : Mar-08-2022

Subject : Right to Information

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 673 OF2011DESH DEEPAK KUMAR VIHANGAM@ DEEPAK KUMAR APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 674-675 OF2011CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 683...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2006

Shri Deepak Kumar S/O Shri Kisan Lal and Smt. Nirmala W/O Shri Deepak ...

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Shri Deepak Kumar S/O Shri Kisan Lal and Smt. Nirmala W/O Shri Deepak Kumar

Respondent : State of Uttar Pradesh and Shri Rajbir Singh S/O Shri Chater Singh

Decided on : Sep-06-2006

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : II(2007)BC622

Vinod Prasad, J.1. A couple, Deepak Kumar and Smt. Nirmala, have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.(herein in after referred to as the Code) and have preferred this criminal Misc. Application No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2017

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Saha vs.state

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Saha

Respondent : State

Decided on : Feb-07-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:7. h February, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 4703/2014 & Crl. M.A. 15996/2014 DEEPAK KUMAR @ DEEPAK SAHA ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Mr.Sandeep Kumar, Ms.Priya...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 29 2013

Kuldeep Kumar @deepak Kumar Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Kuldeep Kumar @deepak Kumar

Respondent : State of Punjab

Decided on : May-29-2013

Subject : Education

CRM not M-40843 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. not M- 40843 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: May 29, 2013. Kuldeep Kumar @Deepak Kumar .....PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2008

Chandan Kumar Manjhi, P.K. Ghosh @ Deepak Kumar Ghosh and Kalika Patha ...

Court : Jharkhand

Appellant : Chandan Kumar Manjhi, P.K. Ghosh @ Deepak Kumar Ghosh and Kalika Pathak

Respondent : The State of Jharkhand and anr.

Decided on : Dec-16-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; Railway Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR940

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.2. In this writ application, the prayer of the petitioners is to quash the F.I.R. of Jugsalai (Bagbera) P.S. Case No. 04/2007, which was registered under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2004

Deep Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Appellant : Deep Kumar @ Deepak Kumar

Respondent : The State of Bihar and ors.

Decided on : Jul-02-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 7; Bihar Trade Articles (Licences Unification) Order, 1984; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 379 and 420

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J. 1. Although in the writ application prayer of the petitioner is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents particularly, respondent No. 2 to release 519 bags...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2003

Sanjiv Kumar Singh and ors., Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Appellant : Sanjiv Kumar Singh and ors., ;dara Singh and ors., ;sanjay Kumar and ors. and Deepak Kumar and ors.

Respondent : State of Jharkhand and ors.

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Laws; Constitution of India - Article 226 and 226(2); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR555(Jhr)]

Vikramaditya Prasad, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. All these writs have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common order as they arise out of the same facts and same...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2009

Deepak Kumar and anr. and Simone Nobili and anr. Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Appellant : Deepak Kumar and anr. and Simone Nobili and anr.;state of H.P.

Respondent : State of H.P.;deepak Kumar and ors.

Decided on : Dec-03-2009

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Surjit Singh, J.1. These three appeals, particulars whereof appear in the title of the judgment, are being disposed of by a common judgment, as all of them are directed against the same judgment, i.e. judgment dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2006

Deepak Kumar Son of Mishri Lal Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Deepak Kumar Son of Mishri Lal

Respondent : State of U.P.

Decided on : Dec-12-2006

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC895

Vijay Kumar Verma, J.1. Heard Sri Shravan Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the applicant and also perused the record.2. From the record it transpires that the applicant, Deepak Kumar had lodged an F.I.R. at P.S. Khaga,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2013

Deepak Kumar Vs. State (Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Deepak Kumar

Respondent : State (Delhi)

Decided on : Mar-07-2013

Subject : Criminal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :25. h February, 2013 DECIDED ON :7. h March, 2013 + CRL.A. 232/2000 DEEPAK KUMAR Through : ....Appellant Mr.Mohd. Shamikh, Advocate. versus STATE (DELHI)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial